1. Bich W, Cox M, Michotte C (2016) Towards a new GUM – an update. Metrologia 53:S149–S159. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/5/S149
2. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAP, and OIML (2008a) Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, tech. rep., JCGM/WG1 GUM. Revised 1st edition –https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/
3. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAP, and OIML (2008b) Evaluation of measurement data – supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” – propogation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, tech. rep., JCGM/WG1 GUM Supplement 1. 1st edition – https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/
4. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAP, and OIML (2011) Evaluation of measurement data – supplement 2 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” – propogation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, tech. rep., JCGM/WG1 GUM Supplement 2. 1st edition – https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/
5. Cox MG, van der Veen AMH (2021) Understanding and treating correlated quantities in measurement uncertainty evaluation. In: van der Veen AMH, Cox MG (eds) Good practice in evaluating measurement uncertainty: compendium of examples. National Physical Laboratory (UK), pp 29–44. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5142180