RAND Appropriateness Study in Regard to Automated Construction Safety: A Global Perspective
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Reference25 articles.
1. Boateng, H., and F.G. Agyemang. 2015. The rise of culture in knowledge sharing in a public-sector organisation in Ghana: Revisiting Hofstede’s Model. International Journal of Public Administration 38 (7): 486–495. 2. Brar S., C. Law, R. McLeod, L. Helyer, C. Swallow, L. Paszat, R. Seevaratnam, R. Cardoso, M. Dixon, A. Mahar, L.G. Lourenco, L. Yohanathan, A. Bocicariu, T. Bekaii-Saab, I. Chau, N. Church, D. Coit, C.H. Crane, C. Earle, P. Mansfield, N. Marcon, T. Miner, S.H. Noh, G. Porter, M.C. Posner, V. Prachand, T. Sano, C. van de Velde, S. Wong, S. and N. Coburn 2013. Defining surgical quality in gastric cancer: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 217(2): 347–357.e341. 3. Chen, Z., D. Chen, T. Wang, and S. Hu. 2015. Policies on end-of-life passenger cars in China: dynamic modeling and cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 108: 1140–1148. 4. Cher, M.L., A. Dhir, G.B. Auffenberg, S. Linsell, Y. Gao, B. Rosenberg, S.M. Jafri, L. Klotz, D.C. Miller, K.R. Ghani, S.J. Bernstein, J.E. Montie, and B.R. Lane. 2017. Appropriateness criteria for active surveillance of prostate cancer. The Journal of Urology 197 (1): 67–74. 5. Drumond, N., D.A. van Riet-Nales, F. Karapinar-Çarkit, and S. Stegemann. 2017. Patients’ appropriateness, acceptability, usability and preferences for pharmaceutical preparations: Results from a literature review on clinical evidence. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 521 (1–2): 294–305.
|
|