Author:
Utomo Prattama Santoso,Greviana Nadia,Sumunar Dimas S. E. W.,Soemantri Diantha,Claramita Mora
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference19 articles.
1. Van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LK et al (2012) A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach 34(3):205–214. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239
2. Van Der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Govaerts MJB, Heeneman S (2015) Twelve tips for programmatic assessment. Med Teach 37(7):641–646. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388
3. Heeneman S, de Jong LH, Dawson LJ, Wilkinson TJ, Ryan A, Tait GR et al (2021) Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment—1. Agreement on the principles. Med Teach 43(10):1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088
4. Ainin DQ, Suhoyo Y, Duarsa ABS, Claramita M (2023) Development of a self-evaluation instrument with programmatic assessment components for undergraduate medical students. Eur J Educ 12(2):649–662. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.649
5. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design. Design Thinking Bootcamp Bootleg. Stanford University (2009). https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57c6b79629687fde090a0fdd/t/58890239db29d6cc6c3338f7/1485374014340/METHODCARDS-v3-slim.pdf.