Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference14 articles.
1. Utsumomya D, Shiraishi S, Imuta M, Tomiguch S, Kawanak K, Morishita S, et al. Added value of SPECT/CT fusion in assessing suspected bone metastasis: comparison with scintigraphy alone and non fused scintigraphy and CT. Radiology. 2006;238:264–71.
2. Miyaji N, Miwa K, Tokiwa A, Ichikawa H, Terauchi T, Koizumi M, et al. Phantom and clinical evaluation of bone SPECT/CT image reconstruction with Xspect algorithm. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Res. 2020;10:71.
3. Scheyerer MJ, Pietsch C, Zimmermann SM, Osterhoff G, Simmen HP, Werner CM. SPECT/CT for imaging of the spine and pelvis in clinical routine: a physician’s perspective of the adoption of SPECT/CT in a clinical setting with a focus on trauma surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(Suppl 1):S59–66.
4. Tbotta F, Jreige M, Schaefer N, Becce F, Prior J, Laonde M. Quantitative bone SPECT/CT: high specificity for identification of prostate cancer bone metastases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:619.
5. Huang K, Feng Y, Liu D, Liang W, Li L. Quantification evaluation of Tc-99m MDP concentration in the lumbar spine with SPECT/CT: compare with bone mineral density. Ann Nucl Med. 2020;34:136–43.