From Abstract Thinking to Thinking Abstractions: Introducing Speculative Geographies

Author:

Williams Nina,Keating Thomas

Abstract

AbstractWriting at a time in which speculative ways of thinking appear to be undergoing a reprise across the social sciences and humanities – whether through engagements with speculative cosmology (Stengers, 2006), speculative empiricism (Debaise, 2017), speculative fabulation (Haraway, 2011), speculative research (Wilkie et al., 2017), or speculative realism (Bryant et al., 2011) – in this chapter we introduce Speculative Geographies and our motivation for assembling the collection as a way of considering what concepts and practices of speculation might mean for geography, and how speculation might itself be conceived as geographical. In approaching the relationship between speculation and geography, we introduce the book as a collective desire to complicate the modes of thought used to evaluate experience by crafting alternatives, pluralising perspectives, and thereby problematising the immediately given. Far from abstract thinking, in this chapter we conceptualise speculation, after A.N. Whitehead, as a task of thinking abstractions – a style of thinking that prioritises an openness to what thought might become, and which therefore reconfigures empirical problems beyond what seems given in an immediate experience. The chapter traces key genealogies of this speculative practice including speculative philosophy, speculative fiction, and speculative design. Finally, we provide an overview of how the three themes of the book – ethics, technologies, aesthetics – speak to the chapters making up this edited collection.

Funder

University of New South Wales Canberra

Swansea University

RMIT University

Publisher

Springer Nature Singapore

Reference96 articles.

1. Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 777–798.

2. Ash, J. (2017). Phase media: Space, time and the politics of smart objects. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

3. Bahng, A. (2017). Plasmoidial improprieties: Octavia E. Butler, Slime molds, and imagining a Femi-Queer commons. In C. Cipolla, K. Gupta, D. A. Rubin, & A. Willey (Eds.), Queer feminist science studies (pp. 310–326). University of Washington Press.

4. Bahng, A. (2018). Migrant futures: Decolonizing speculation in financial times. Duke University Press.

5. Barry, K., Duffy, M., & Lobo, M. (2021). Speculative listening: Melting sea ice and new methods of listening with the planet. Global Discourse, 11(1–2), 115–129.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Matter, affect, life: A Whiteheadian intervention into ‘more-than-human’ geographies;Dialogues in Human Geography;2024-05-21

2. Nuclear memory: Archival, aesthetic, speculative;Progress in Environmental Geography;2023-05-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3