Abstract
AbstractRandomized response is an interview technique for sensitive questions designed to eliminate evasive response bias. Since this elimination is only partially successful, two models have been proposed for modeling evasive response bias: the cheater detection model for a design with two sub-samples with different randomization probabilities and the self-protective no sayers model for a design with multiple sensitive questions. This paper shows the correspondence between these models, and introduces models for the new, hybrid “ever/last year” design that account for self-protective no saying and cheating. The model for one set of ever/last year questions has a degree of freedom that can be used for the inclusion of a response bias parameter. Models with multiple degrees of freedom are introduced for extensions of the design with a third randomized response question and a second set of ever/last year questions. The models are illustrated with two surveys on doping use. We conclude with a discussion of the pros and cons of the ever/last year design and its potential for future research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Böckenholt, U., Barlas, S., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2009). Do randomized-response designs eliminate response biases? An empirical study of non-compliance behavior. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(3), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1052
2. Böckenholt, U., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2007). Item randomized-response models for measuring noncompliance: Risk-return perceptions, social influences, and self-protective responses. Psychometrika, 72(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1495-y
3. Boeije, H., & Lensvelt-Mulders, G. (2002). Honest by chance: A qualitative interview study to clarify respondents’ (non-) compliance with computer-assisted randomized response. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 75(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910630207500104
4. Boruch, R. F. (1971). Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: A note on strategies. The American Sociologist, 6(4), 308–311.
5. Chaudhuri, A., & Mukerjee, R. (1988). Randomized response: Theory and techniques. Marcel Dekker.