Abstract
AbstractThe longitudinal process that leads to university student dropout in STEM subjects can be described by referring to (a) inter-individual differences (e.g., cognitive abilities) as well as (b) intra-individual changes (e.g., affective states), (c) (unobserved) heterogeneity of trajectories, and d) time-dependent variables. Large dynamic latent variable model frameworks for intensive longitudinal data (ILD) have been proposed which are (partially) capable of simultaneously separating the complex data structures (e.g., DLCA; Asparouhov et al. in Struct Equ Model 24:257–269, 2017; DSEM; Asparouhov et al. in Struct Equ Model 25:359–388, 2018; NDLC-SEM, Kelava and Brandt in Struct Equ Model 26:509–528, 2019). From a methodological perspective, forecasting in dynamic frameworks allowing for real-time inferences on latent or observed variables based on ongoing data collection has not been an extensive research topic. From a practical perspective, there has been no empirical study on student dropout in math that integrates ILD, dynamic frameworks, and forecasting of critical states of the individuals allowing for real-time interventions. In this paper, we show how Bayesian forecasting of multivariate intra-individual variables and time-dependent class membership of individuals (affective states) can be performed in these dynamic frameworks using a Forward Filtering Backward Sampling method. To illustrate our approach, we use an empirical example where we apply the proposed forecasting method to ILD from a large university student dropout study in math with multivariate observations collected over 50 measurement occasions from multiple students ($$N = 122$$
N
=
122
). More specifically, we forecast emotions and behavior related to dropout. This allows us to predict emerging critical dynamic states (e.g., critical stress levels or pre-decisional states) 8 weeks before the actual dropout occurs.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Psychology
Reference69 articles.
1. Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2018). Motivation and volition in the course of action. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (3rd ed., pp. 485–527). Springer.
2. Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Dynamic latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1253479
3. Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 359–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803
4. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis using Mplus: Technical implementation. Technical Report, Version 3. Retrieved from http://statmodel.com/download/Bayes3.pdf
5. Bauer, D. J. (2005). A semiparametric approach to modeling nonlinear relations among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4, 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1204_1.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献