Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to describe the surgical steps for the single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal approach to pyeloplasty, report its feasibility, and share the initial outcomes of our experience.
Methods
We analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). The surgical steps included a pure single-port approach through a 3.5 cm low anterolateral incision two fingerbreadths above the superior pubic ramus. The ureter was localized and followed cranially, a dismembered pyeloplasty was performed, and a running ureteropelvic anastomosis was completed. No drains were placed. The urinary catheter was removed upon discharge, and the ureteral stent after 3–5 weeks.
Results
A total of eight cases (two adults and six children) were completed successfully, without complications or conversions. Median operative time, console time, and estimated blood loss were 208.5 min, 114.5 min, and 10.0 ml, respectively. All patients were discharged within 24 h, except for one that required urinary output observation due to retention. There were no major postoperative complications. The median pain score at discharge was 0/10. Only one patient was prescribed PRN opioids at discharge. The readmission rate was 0.0%. All patients were asymptomatic on their last follow-up with no definitive obstruction on imaging, and no requirement for additional procedures or stents.
Conclusion
Single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty is a feasible alternative for surgical treatment of UPJO in adult and pediatric patients with improved recovery outcomes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Nakada SY, Best SL (2021) Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology, 12th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1942–1981
2. Anderson JC, Hynes W (1951) Plastic operation for hydronephrosis. Proc R Soc Med 44(1):4–5
3. Chan YY, Durbin-Johnson B, Sturm RM, Kurzrock EA (2017) Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions. J Pediatr Urol 13(1):49 e1-e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.08.029
4. Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Peters CA (2006) Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol 175(2):683–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00183-7
5. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV et al (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150:1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35898-6
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献