Author:
Hasan Yılmaz,Özdal Dillioğlugil
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference7 articles.
1. Sanches BCF, Lalli AL, Neto WA, Billis A, Reis LO (2018) Are 10-, 10–12-, or > 12 mm prostate biopsy core quality control cutoffs reasonable? World J Urol.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2242-6
(Published online March 1)
2. Yılmaz H, Yavuz U, Ustuner M, Ciftci S, Yassar H, Muezzinoglu B, Uslubas AK, Dillioglugil O (2017) Longer biopsy cores do not increase prostate cancer detection rate: a large-scale cohort study refuting cut-off values indicated in the literature. Turk J Urol 43(3):297–302
3. Boccon-Gibod L, van der Kwast TH, Montironi R, Boccon-Gibod L, Bono A et al (2004) European society of uropathology; handling and pathology reporting of prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 46:177–181
4. Bertaccini A, Fandella A, Prayer-Galetti T, Scattoni V, Galosi AB, Ficarra V et al (2007) Systematic development of clinical practice guidelines for prostate biopsies: a 3-year Italian project. Anticancer Res 27:659–666
5. Van der Kwast T, Bubendorf L, Mazerolles C, Raspollini MR, Van Leenders GJ, Pihl CG et al (2013) Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC). Virchows Arch 463:367–377