Urosepsis 30-day mortality, morbidity, and their risk factors: SERPENS study, a prospective, observational multi-center study
-
Published:2024-05-10
Issue:1
Volume:42
Page:
-
ISSN:1433-8726
-
Container-title:World Journal of Urology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:World J Urol
Author:
Tandogdu ZaferORCID, Koves Bela, Ristovski Slobodan, Balci Mustafa Bahadir Can, Rennesund Kristin, Gravas Stavros, Nale DjordJe, Medina-Polo José, Garabášová Mária Kopilec, Costantini Elisabetta, Cano-Valasco Jorge, Glavinova Maja Sofronievska, Bruyere Franck, Perepanova Tamara, Kulchavenya Ekaterina, Cek Mete, Wagenlehner Florian, Johansen Truls Erik Bjerklund,
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To provide a descriptive report of mortality and morbidity in the first 30 days of diagnosis of urosepsis. Secondary aim is to identify risk factors of unfavourable outcomes.
Methods
Prospective observational multicentre cohort study conducted from September 2014 to November 2018 in European hospitals. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with acute urosepsis according to Sepsis-2 criteria with confirmed microbiological infection were included. Outcomes were classified in one of four health states: death, multiple organ failure, single organ failure, and recovery at day 30 from onset of urosepsis. Descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed.
Results
Three hundred and fifty four patients were recruited, and 30-day mortality rate was 2.8%, rising to 4.6% for severe sepsis. All patients who died had a SOFA score of ≥ 2 at diagnosis. Upon initial diagnosis, 79% (n = 281) of patients presented with OF. Within 30 days, an additional 5% developed OF, resulting in a total of 84% affected. Charlson score (OR 1.14 CI 1.01–1.28), patients with respiratory failure at baseline (OR 2.35, CI 1.32–4.21), ICU admission within the past 12 months (OR 2.05, CI 1.00–4.19), obstruction causative of urosepsis (OR 1.76, CI 1.02–3.05), urosepsis with multi-drug-resistant(MDR) pathogens (OR 2.01, CI 1.15–3.53), and SOFA baseline score ≥ 2 (OR 2.74, CI 1.49–5.07) are significantly associated with day 30 outcomes (OF and death).
Conclusions
Impact of comorbidities and MDR pathogens on outcomes highlights the existence of a distinct group of patients who are prone to mortality and morbidity. These findings underscore the need for the development of pragmatic classifications to better assess the severity of UTIs and guide management strategies.
Study registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02380170.
Funder
European Association of Urology Research Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, Colombara DV, Ikuta KS, Kissoon N, Finfer S et al (2020) Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet 395(10219):200–211 2. Leligdowicz A, Dodek PM, Norena M, Wong H, Kumar A, Kumar A (2014) Association between source of infection and hospital mortality in patients who have septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189(10):1204–1213 3. Liu V, Escobar GJ, Greene JD, Soule J, Whippy A, Angus DC, Iwashyna TJ (2014) Hospital deaths in patients with sepsis from 2 independent cohorts. JAMA 312(1):90–92 4. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med 49(11):e1063–e1143 5. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801–810
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|