Abstract
AbstractThis study examined whether using an artificial neural network (ANN) helps beginners in diagnostic cardiac imaging to achieve similar results to experts when interpreting stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). One hundred and thirty-eight patients underwent stress MPI with Tc-labeled agents. An expert and a beginner interpreted stress/rest MPI with or without the ANN and the results were compared. The myocardium was divided into 5 regions (the apex; septum; anterior; lateral, and inferior regions), and the defect score of myocardial blood flow was evaluated from 0 to 4, and SSS, SRS, and SDS were calculated. The ANN effect, defined as the difference in each of these scores between with and without the ANN, was calculated to investigate the influence of ANN on the interpreters' performance. We classified 2 groups (insignificant perfusion group and significant perfusion group) and compared them. In the same way, classified 2 groups (insignificant ischemia group and significant ischemia group) and compared them. Besides, we classified 2 groups (normal vessels group and multi-vessels group) and compared them. The ANN effect was smaller for the expert than for the beginner. Besides, the ANN effect for insignificant perfusion group, insignificant ischemia group and multi-vessels group were smaller for the expert than for the beginner. On the other hand, the ANN effect for significant perfusion group, significant ischemia group and normal vessels group were no significant. When interpreting MPI, beginners may achieve similar results to experts by using an ANN. Thus, interpreting MPI with ANN may be useful for beginners. Furthermore, when beginners interpret insignificant perfusion group, insignificant ischemia group and multi-vessel group, beginners may achieve similar results to experts by using an ANN.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference14 articles.
1. Nensa F, Demircioglu A, Rischpler C (2019) Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med 60(Suppl 2):29s–37s
2. Fujita H, Katafuchi T, Uehara T, Nishimura T (1992) Application of artificial neural network to computer-aided diagnosis of coronary artery disease in myocardial SPECT bull’s-eye images. J Nucl Med 33(2):272–276
3. Hu LH, Betancur J, Sharir T, Einstein AJ, Bokhari S, Fish MB et al (2019) Machine learning predicts per-vessel early coronary revascularization after fast myocardial perfusion SPECT: results from multicentre REFINE SPECT registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez177
4. Ding Y, Sohn JH, Kawczynski MG, Trivedi H, Harnish R, Jenkins NW et al (2019) A Deep Learning Model to Predict a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Using (18)F-FDG PET of the Brain. Radiology 290(2):456–464
5. JCS Joint Working Group (2012) Guidelines for clinical use of cardiac nuclear medicine (JCS 2010)–digest version. Circ J. 76(3):761–767
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献