Author:
Wong Raymond C.,Cerqueira Manuel D.,Brunken Richard C.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference19 articles.
1. Parkash R, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD et al (2004) Potential utility of rubidium-82 PET quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 11(4):440–449
2. Lertsburapa K, Ahlberg AW, Bateman TM et al (2008) Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium-82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 15(6):745–753
3. Brown TL, Merrill J, Volokh L, Bengel FM (2008) Determinants of the response of left ventricular ejection fraction to vasodilator stress in electrocardiographically gated (82)rubidium myocardial perfusion PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(2):336–342
4. Dorbala S, Vangala D, Sampson U, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF (2007) Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: a 82Rb PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 48(3):349–358
5. Go RT, MacIntyre WJ, Cook SA et al (1996) The incidence of scintigraphically viable and nonviable tissue by rubidium-82 and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in patients with prior infarction and left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol 3(2):96–104
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献