Radiative Corrections and the Renormalization Group for the Two-Nucleon Interaction in Effective Field Theory-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Radiative Corrections and the Renormalization Group for the Two-Nucleon Interaction in Effective Field Theory

Published:2024-08-05 Issue:3 Volume:65 Page:
ISSN:1432-5411
Container-title:Few-Body Systems
language:en
Short-container-title:Few-Body Syst

Author:

Richardson Thomas R.^ORCID,Reis Immo C.^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractWe use a combination of effective field theory and the renormalization group to determine the impact of radiative corrections on the nucleon–nucleon potential and the binding energy of the deuteron. In order to do so, we present a modified version of pionless effective field theory inspired by earlier work in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics. The renormalization group improvement of the deuteron binding energy leads to a shift on the order of a few percent and is consistent with the experimental value. This work serves as a starting point for a dedicated study of radiative corrections in few-body systems relevant for precision tests of the Standard Model in an effective field theory framework.

Funder

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00601-024-01948-8.pdf

Reference58 articles.

1. D. Počanić, R. Alarcon, L.P. Alonzi, S. Baeßler, S. Balascuta, J.D. Bowman, M.A. Bychkov, J. Byrne, J.R. Calarco, V. Cianciolo, C. Crawford, E. Frlež, M.T. Gericke, G.L. Greene, R.K. Grzywacz, V. Gudkov, F.W. Hersman, A. Klein, J. Martin, S.A. Page, A. Palladino, S.I. Penttilä, K.P. Rykaczewski, W.S. Wilburn, A.R. Young, G.R. Young, Nab: Measurement principles, apparatus and uncertainties. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 611(2), 211–215 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.07.065

2. D. Dubbers, H. Abele, S. Baeßler, B. Märkisch, M. Schumann, T. Soldner, O. Zimmer, A clean, bright, and versatile source of neutron decay products. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 596(2), 238–247 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.07.157

3. V.A. Andreev, R.M. Carey, V.A. Ganzha, A. Gardestig, T. Gorringe, F.E. Gray, D.W. Hertzog, M. Hildebrandt, P. Kammel, B. Kiburg, S. Knaack, P.A. Kravtsov, A.G. Krivshich, K. Kubodera, B. Lauss, K.R. Lynch, E.M. Maev, O.E. Maev, F. Mulhauser, F. Myhrer, C. Petitjean, G.E. Petrov, R. Prieels, G.N. Schapkin, G.G. Semenchuk, M.A. Soroka, V. Tishchenko, A.A. Vasilyev, A.A. Vorobyov, M.E. Vznuzdaev, P. Winter, Muon Capture on the Deuteron: The MuSun Experiment (2010). arXiv: 1004.1754

4. P. Kammel, MuSun-Muon capture on the deuteron. SciPost Phys. Proc. 5, 18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.5.018

5. A. Antognini, S. Bacca, A. Fleischmann, L. Gastaldo, F. Hagelstein, P. Indelicato, A. Knecht, V. Lensky, B. Ohayon, V. Pascalutsa, N. Paul, R. Pohl, F. Wauters, Muonic-atom spectroscopy and impact on nuclear structure and precision QED theory (2022). arXiv:2210.16929