Monotonic and cyclic triaxial testing of untreated and polyurethane-treated soil and soil–rubber mixtures

Abstract

AbstractThe present research focuses on developing alternate sustainable base materials for a high-speed slab track. In this study, a series of monotonic triaxial, cyclic triaxial and permeability tests were conducted on four types of materials, viz. mix-A (gravel soil), mix-B (soil mixed with rubber), mix-C (polyurethane foam adhesive (PFA)-treated soil), and mix-D (PFA-treated soil–rubber mixture). The influence of cyclic loading frequency, effective confining pressure, drainage condition and relative density on the deformation, excess pore water pressure, resilient modulus and damping ratio of these different mixes is evaluated. The monotonic triaxial test results indicate that the PFA treatment of mix-A and mix-B increased their shear strength and critical state strength. In contrast, incorporating rubber into mix-A and mix-C helped enhance their ductility. The cyclic triaxial test results show that the PFA treatment of mix-A and mix-B significantly reduced the magnitude of deformation and generation of excess pore water pressure, which caused these untreated mixes to fail prematurely under lower confinement to which a typical base layer is subjected. The influence of cyclic loading frequency and effective confining pressure on the material's response differed for untreated and treated soil. The permeability test results indicate good drainage for mix-D comparable to mix-A.