Author:
Zhu Junchang,Cen Wei,Zheng Xuzhi,Ye Chenqiao,Guo Feifan,Yan Xialin,Shi Hongying,Ye Lechi,Hu Tingting
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
We aimed to develop an elaborative nomogram that predicts cancer-specific survival (CSS) in American and Chinese octogenarians treated with radical resection for CRC.
Methods
The patient data of newly diagnosed patients aged 80 years or older who underwent radical resection for CRC from 2010 to 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and then randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. The patients collected from our hospital were defined as the external validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was used to select independent predictive factors for the construction of a nomogram to predict 1-, 2- and 3-year CSS.
Results
The multivariate Cox regression model identified age, T stage, N stage, perineural invasion, chemotherapy, tumour deposits, carcinoembryonic antigen level, number of lymph node metastases, and number of solid organ metastases as independent predictors of survival. The C-index of the nomogram for 1-, 2- and 3-year CSS was 0.758, 0.762, and 0.727, respectively, demonstrating significant clinical value and substantial reliability compared to the TNM stage. The calibration curve and area under the curve also indicated considerable predictive accuracy. In addition, decision curve analysis demonstrated desirable net benefits in clinical application.
Conclusion
We constructed a nomogram for predicting the CSS of individual octogenarian patients with CRC who underwent radical resection. The nomogram performed better than the TNM staging system in this particular population and could guide clinicians in clinical follow-up and individual therapeutic plan formulation.
Funder
The National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
Public Welfare Project of Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. European Commission B Population Structure and Ageing. [(accessed on 19 December 2022)]; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Population_structure_and_ageing
2. Olshansky SJ, Goldman DP, Zheng Y, Rowe JW (2009) Aging in America in the twenty-first century: demographic forecasts from the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on an Aging Society. Milbank Q 87:842–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00581.x
3. Cancer Registry and Statistics (Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ)). Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan. https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/dl/index.html. Accessed 19 December 2022. In Japanese
4. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A (2022) Cancer statistics, 2022. Cancer J Clin 72. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708
5. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A et al (2020) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA: a Cancer. J Clin 70:145–164. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21601