1. Article 36 (2013). Killer Robots: UK Government Policy on Fully Autonomous Weapons https://article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Policy_Paper1.pdf
2. Australia (2018). The Australian Article 36 Review Process. Group of Governmental Experts of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects. https://docs-library.unoda.org/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-_Group_of_Governmental_Experts_(2018)/2018_GGE%2BLAWS_August_Working%2Bpaper_Australia.pdf
3. Backstrom, A., & Henderson, I. (2012). New Capabilities in Warfare: an overview of Contemporary Technological Developments and the Associated Legal and Engineering Issues in Article 36 Weapons Reviews. International Review of the Red Cross, 94, 483–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000707
4. Bernstein, G. (2007). Towards a General Theory of Law and Technology: introduction. Minnesota Journal of Law Science & Technology, 8, 441–448.
5. Boothby, W. (2018). Dehumanization: Is There a Legal Problem Under Article 36?. In W. Heintschel von Heinegg, R. Frau & T. Singer (Eds), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies (pp. 21–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67266-3