Legal reviews of in situ learning in autonomous weapons

Author:

McFarland TimORCID,Assaad ZenaORCID

Abstract

AbstractA legal obligation to conduct weapons reviews is a means by which the international community can ensure that States assess whether the use of new types of weapons in armed conflict would raise humanitarian concerns. The use of artificial intelligence in weapon systems greatly complicates the process of conducting reviews, particularly where a weapon system is capable of continuing to ‘learn’ on its own after being deployed on the battlefield. This paper surveys current understandings of the weapons review challenges presented by in situ learning and outlines some concepts which may inform appropriate changes to existing weapons review processes. The main arguments made are that: a distinction should be drawn between learning capabilities that are limited to optimising existing behaviour and capabilities that extend to acquiring new behaviours; and the extent of a weapon system’s learning capabilities should be used as the basis for defining a schedule of weapons reviews.

Funder

Defence Cooperative Research Centre for Trusted Autonomous Systems

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference49 articles.

1. Article 36 (2013). Killer Robots: UK Government Policy on Fully Autonomous Weapons https://article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Policy_Paper1.pdf

2. Australia (2018). The Australian Article 36 Review Process. Group of Governmental Experts of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects. https://docs-library.unoda.org/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-_Group_of_Governmental_Experts_(2018)/2018_GGE%2BLAWS_August_Working%2Bpaper_Australia.pdf

3. Backstrom, A., & Henderson, I. (2012). New Capabilities in Warfare: an overview of Contemporary Technological Developments and the Associated Legal and Engineering Issues in Article 36 Weapons Reviews. International Review of the Red Cross, 94, 483–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000707

4. Bernstein, G. (2007). Towards a General Theory of Law and Technology: introduction. Minnesota Journal of Law Science & Technology, 8, 441–448.

5. Boothby, W. (2018). Dehumanization: Is There a Legal Problem Under Article 36?. In W. Heintschel von Heinegg, R. Frau & T. Singer (Eds), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies (pp. 21–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67266-3

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Military robots should not look like a humans;Ethics and Information Technology;2023-08-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3