The landscape of data and AI documentation approaches in the European policy context
-
Published:2023-10-28
Issue:4
Volume:25
Page:
-
ISSN:1388-1957
-
Container-title:Ethics and Information Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ethics Inf Technol
Author:
Micheli MarinaORCID, Hupont Isabelle, Delipetrev Blagoj, Soler-Garrido Josep
Abstract
AbstractNowadays, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is present in all sectors of the economy. Consequently, both data-the raw material used to build AI systems- and AI have an unprecedented impact on society and there is a need to ensure that they work for its benefit. For this reason, the European Union has put data and trustworthy AI at the center of recent legislative initiatives. An important element in these regulations is transparency, understood as the provision of information to relevant stakeholders to support their understanding of AI systems and data throughout their lifecycle. In recent years, an increasing number of approaches for documenting AI and datasets have emerged, both within academia and the private sector. In this work, we identify the 36 most relevant ones from more than 2200 papers related to trustworthy AI. We assess their relevance from the angle of European regulatory objectives, their coverage of AI technologies and economic sectors, and their suitability to address the specific needs of multiple stakeholders. Finally, we discuss the main documentation gaps found, including the need to better address data innovation practices (e.g. data sharing, data reuse) and large-scale algorithmic systems (e.g. those used in online platforms), and to widen the focus from algorithms and data to AI systems as a whole.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference74 articles.
1. Adkins, D., Alsallakh, B., Cheema, A., Kokhlikyan, N., McReynolds, E., Mishra, P., Procope, C., Sawruk, J., Wang, E., & Zvyagina, P. (2022a). Method cards for prescriptive machine-learning transparency. In 2022 IEEE/ACM 1st international conference on AI engineering–software engineering for AI (CAIN) (pp. 90–100). 2. Adkins, D., Alsallakh, B., Cheema, A., Kokhlikyan, N., McReynolds, E., Mishra, P., Procope, C., Sawruk, J., Wang, E., & Zvyagina, P. (2022b). Prescriptive and descriptive approaches to machine-learning transparency. In CHI conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts (pp. 1–9). 3. Afzal, S., Rajmohan, C., Kesarwani, M., Mehta, S., & Patel, H. (2021). Data readiness report. In 2021 IEEE international conference on smart data services (SMDS) (pp. 42–51). IEEE. 4. Amith, M. T., Cui, L., Zhi, D., Roberts, K., Jiang, X., Li, F., Yu, E., & Tao, C. (2022). Toward a standard formal semantic representation of the model card report. BMC Bioinformatics, 23(6), 1–18. 5. Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|