Algorithmic decision-making employing profiling: will trade secrecy protection render the right to explanation toothless?

Author:

de Laat Paul B.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractAlgorithmic decision-making based on profiling may significantly affect people’s destinies. As a rule, however, explanations for such decisions are lacking. What are the chances for a “right to explanation” to be realized soon? After an exploration of the regulatory efforts that are currently pushing for such a right it is concluded that, at the moment, the GDPR stands out as the main force to be reckoned with. In cases of profiling, data subjects are granted the right to receive meaningful information about the functionality of the system in use; for fully automated profiling decisions even an explanation has to be given. However, the trade secrets and intellectual property rights (IPRs) involved must be respected as well. These conflicting rights must be balanced against each other; what will be the outcome? Looking back to 1995, when a similar kind of balancing had been decreed in Europe concerning the right of access (DPD), Wachter et al. (2017) find that according to judicial opinion only generalities of the algorithm had to be disclosed, not specific details. This hardly augurs well for a future right of access let alone to explanation. Thereupon the landscape of IPRs for machine learning (ML) is analysed. Spurred by new USPTO guidelines that clarify when inventions are eligible to be patented, the number of patent applications in the US related to ML in general, and to “predictive analytics” in particular, has soared since 2010—and Europe has followed. I conjecture that in such a climate of intensified protection of intellectual property, companies may legitimately claim that the more their application combines several ML assets that, in addition, are useful in multiple sectors, the more value is at stake when confronted with a call for explanation by data subjects. Consequently, the right to explanation may be severely crippled.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference67 articles.

1. algo:aware. (2018). Raising awareness on algorithms. Procured by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. Version 1.0, December 2018. https://AlgoAware-State-of-the-Art-Report.pdf (actuary.eu).

2. Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2019. (2019). House Resolution 2231. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2231/text.

3. AlgorithmWatch. (2019). Automating Society; Taking Stock of Automated Decision-Making in the EU. A report by AlgorithmWatch in cooperation with the Bertelsmann Stiftung, supported by the Open Society Foundations. 1st edition, January 2019. www.algorithmwatch.org/automating-society.

4. Arrieta, A. B., Rodriguez, N.D., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., González, A. B., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, V.R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2019). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10045.

5. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2018). Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679. 17/EN, WP251rev.01. ARTICLE29—Item (europa.eu).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3