Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Act
-
Published:2024-03-20
Issue:2
Volume:26
Page:
-
ISSN:1388-1957
-
Container-title:Ethics and Information Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ethics Inf Technol
Author:
Hupont IsabelleORCID, Fernández-Llorca DavidORCID, Baldassarri SandraORCID, Gómez EmiliaORCID
Abstract
AbstractDespite recent efforts by the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community to move towards standardised procedures for documenting models, methods, systems or datasets, there is currently no methodology focused on use cases aligned with the risk-based approach of the European AI Act (AI Act). In this paper, we propose a new framework for the documentation of use cases that we call use case cards, based on the use case modelling included in the Unified Markup Language (UML) standard. Unlike other documentation methodologies, we focus on the intended purpose and operational use of an AI system. It consists of two main parts: firstly, a UML-based template, tailored to allow implicitly assessing the risk level of the AI system and defining relevant requirements, and secondly, a supporting UML diagram designed to provide information about the system-user interactions and relationships. The proposed framework is the result of a co-design process involving a relevant team of EU policy experts and scientists. We have validated our proposal with 11 experts with different backgrounds and a reasonable knowledge of the AI Act as a prerequisite. We provide the 5 use case cards used in the co-design and validation process. Use case cards allows framing and contextualising use cases in an effective way, and we hope this methodology can be a useful tool for policy makers and providers for documenting use cases, assessing the risk level, adapting the different requirements and building a catalogue of existing usages of AI.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Adkins, D., Alsallakh, B., Cheema, A., Kokhlikyan, N., McReynolds, E., Mishra, P. & Zvyagina, P. (2022a). Method cards for prescriptive machine-learning transparency. In IEEE/ACM 1st International Conference on AI Engineering–Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) (pp. 90–100). 2. Adkins, D., Alsallakh, B., Cheema, A., Kokhlikyan, N., McReynolds, E., Mishra, P., & Zvyagina, P. (2022b). Prescriptive and descriptive approaches to machine-learning transparency. In CHI conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts (pp. 1–9). 3. Amini, R., Willemsen, M.C. & Graus, M.P. (2019). Affective music recommender system (MRS): Investigating the effectiveness and user satisfaction of different mood inducement strategies. 4. Arnold, M., Bellamy, R. K., Hind, M., Houde, S., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., et al. (2019). AI FactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier’s declarations of conformity. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 63(4/5), 6–1. 5. Baldassarri, S., Hupont, I., Abadía, D., & Cerezo, E. (2015). Affective-aware tutoring platform for interactive digital television. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(9), 3183–3206.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|