Abstract
AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has catalysed what may soon become a permanent digital transition in the domains of work, education, medicine, and leisure. This transition has also precipitated a spike in concern regarding our digital well-being. Prominent lobbying groups, such as the Center for Humane Technology (CHT), have responded to this concern. In April 2020, the CHT has offered a set of ‘Digital Well-Being Guidelines during the COVID-19 Pandemic.’ These guidelines offer a rule-based approach to digital well-being, one which aims to mitigate the effects of moving much of our lives online. The CHT’s guidelines follow much recent interest in digital well-being in the last decade. Ethicists of technology have recently argued that character-based strategies and redesigning of online architecture have the potential to promote the digital well-being of online technology users. In this article, I evaluate (1) the CHT’s rule-based approach, comparing it with (2) character-based strategies and (3) approaches to redesigning online architecture. I argue that all these approaches have some merit, but that each needs to contribute to an integrated approach to digital well-being in order to surmount the challenges of a post-COVID world in which we may well spend much of our lives online.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference58 articles.
1. Arora, P. (2019). The next billion users: Digital life beyond the west. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Belli, J. (2016). Unhappy? There’s an App for that. Digital Culture and Society, 2(1), 89–104.
3. Birkjær and Kaats (2019). ‘#SortingOutSocialMedia.’ Happiness Research Institute. 1–44. Retrieved 15 May 2020 from https://13orden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1328300/pdf/.
4. Brey, P. (2015). Design for the value of human well-being. In J. van den Hoven, P. Vermaas, & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics values and technological design. New York: Springer Publishing.
5. Burr, C. et al. (2018). An analysis of the interaction between intelligent software agents and human users. Minds and Machines, 28, 735–774.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献