Abstract
AbstractRescue operations taking place in disaster settings can be fraught with ethical challenges. Further ethical challenges will likely be introduced by the use of robots, which are expected to soon become commonplace in search and rescue missions and disaster recovery efforts. To help focus timely reflection on the ethical considerations associated with the deployment of rescue robots, we have conducted a scoping review exploring the relevant academic literature following a widely recognized scoping review framework. Of the 429 papers identified by the first screening, six fulfilled the selection criteria of our literature review. Quantitative data synthesis showed that a subset of the papers includes a qualitative experimental exploration of the ethical issues at hand, with workshops involving both experts and potential users. Most use simulations or scenarios to anticipate the ethical implications and other consequences of using robots in search and rescue missions. Qualitative text analysis identified seven core ethically relevant themes: fairness and discrimination; false or excessive expectations; labor replacement; privacy; responsibility; safety; trust. Our results suggest that the literature on ethics in rescue robotics is scant and disparate, but the papers identified uniformly endorsed a proactive approach to handling the ethical concerns associated with the use of robots in disaster scenarios.
Funder
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Università degli Studi di Genova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference68 articles.
1. Adams, S., Levitan, M., & Friedland, C. (2014). High resolution imagery collection for post-disaster studies utilizing unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 12, 1161–1168.
2. Amigoni, F., & Schiaffonati, V. (2018). Ethics for robots as experimental technologies: Pairing anticipation with exploration to evaluate the social impact of robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25(1), 30–36.
3. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals and it’s biased against blacks. Propublica.
4. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
5. Bird, E., Fox-Skelly, J., Jenner, N., Larbey, R., Weitkamp, E., & Winfield, A. (2020). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives. Brussels. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/634452/EPRS_STU(2020)634452_EN.p%0Adf%3E.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献