Abstract
AbstractSmart Cities consist of a multitude of interconnected devices and services to, among others, enhance efficiency, comfort, and safety. To achieve these aims, smart cities rely on an interplay of measures including the deployment of interventions targeted to foster certain human behaviors, such as saving energy, or collecting and exchanging sensor and user data. Both aspects have ethical implications, e.g., when it comes to intervention design or the handling of privacy-related data such as personal information, user preferences or geolocations. Resulting concerns must be taken seriously, as they reduce user acceptance and can even lead to the abolition of otherwise promising Smart City projects. Established guidelines for ethical research and practice from the psychological sciences provide a useful framework for the kinds of ethical issues raised when designing human-centered interventions or dealing with user-generated data. This article thus reviews relevant psychological guidelines and discusses their applicability to the Smart City context. A special focus is on the guidelines’ implications and resulting challenges for certain Smart City applications. Additionally, potential gaps in current guidelines and the limits of applicability are reflected upon.
Funder
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference69 articles.
1. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
2. American Psychological Association (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved 24th July 2023 from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf.
3. Artyushina, A. (2023). Can a smart city exist as commons? The case of automated governance in sidewalk Toronto. In B. Frischmann, M. Madison, & M. Sanfilippo (Eds.), Governing smart cities as knowledge commons (Cambridge Studies on Governing Knowledge Commons, pp. 248–266). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108938532.012.
4. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
5. Bianchini, D., & Avila, I. (2014). Smart cities and their smart decisions: Ethical considerations. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 33(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2014.2301854.