Author:
Prentius Wilmer,Zhao Xin,Grafström Anton
Abstract
AbstractNew ways to combine data from multiple environmental area frame surveys of a finite population are being introduced. Environmental surveys often sample finite populations through area frames. However, to combine multiple surveys without risking bias, design components (inclusion probabilities, etc.) are needed at unit level of the finite population. We show how to derive the design components and exemplify this for three commonly used area frame sampling designs. We show how to produce an unbiased estimator using data from multiple surveys, and how to reduce the risk of introducing significant bias in linear combinations of estimators from multiple surveys. If separate estimators and variance estimators are used in linear combinations, there’s a risk of introducing negative bias. By using pooled variance estimators, the bias of a linear combination estimator can be reduced. National environmental surveys often provide good estimators at national level, while being too sparse to provide sufficiently good estimators for some domains. With the proposed methods, one can plan extra sampling efforts for such domains, without discarding readily available information from the aggregate/national survey. Through simulation, we show that the proposed methods are either unbiased, or yield low variance with small bias, compared to traditionally used methods.
Funder
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),General Environmental Science,Statistics and Probability
Reference12 articles.
1. Allard A (2017) NILS—a nationwide inventory program for monitoring the conditions and changes of the Swedish landscape. In: Diaz-Delgado R, Lucas R, Hurford C (eds) The roles of remote sensing in nature conservation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 79–90
2. Axelsson A, Ståhl G, Söderberg U, Petersson H, Fridman J, Lundström A (2010) Sweden. In: Tomppo E, Gschwantner T, Lawrence M, McRoberts R (eds) National forest inventories: pathways for common reporting. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 541–553
3. Benedetti R, Piersimoni F, Postiglione P (2015) Sampling spatial units for agricultural surveys. Springer, Berlin
4. Christensen P, Ringvall AH (2013) Using statistical power analysis as a tool when designing a monitoring program: experience from a large-scale Swedish landscape monitoring program. Environ Monit Assess 185(9):7279–7293
5. Fecso R, Tortora RD, Vogel FA (1986) Sampling frames for agriculture in the United States. J Off Stat 2(3):279–292