Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
This study evaluated the reproducibility of electronic color determination system evaluations of the marginal gingiva, which could be important for adhesive cervical fillings or prosthetic restorations that imitate the gingiva.
Material and methods
In 50 subjects, the L*, a*, and b* color coordinates were evaluated five times at a point in the marginal area of a central incisor using different electronic color determination systems: (SP) Shadepilot, (ES) Easyshade, (CE) Crystaleye, and (SV) X-Rite. The mean color difference (ΔE) and its standard deviation between the five measurements from each participant were calculated separately for each device. Further ICC for interdevice reliability was determined.
Results
The L*, a*, and b* color coordinates and ΔE values differed significantly among the systems (p < 0.001). Within each patient and measurement system, ΔE ranged from 1.4 to 3.2 (SD 1.1–2.5), L* from 2.6 to 5.7 (SD 2.6–5.7), a* from 11.9 to 21.3 (SD 3.6–3.9), and b* from 15.1 to 28.9 (SD 1.7–4.3). Interdevice reliability ranged between 0.675 and 0.807.
Conclusions
Color determination of the marginal gingiva using the electronic tooth color determination systems tested herein showed limited reproducibility. The results obtained with the different measurement systems differed enormously.
Clinical relevance
These results show that the electronic color measurement devices tested allow no high reproducible determination of color coordinates of the marginal gingiva.
Funder
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Khurana PR, Thomas PV, Rao SV, Balamuragan R, Singh MP (2009) A clinical study to correlate maxillary anterior natural teeth with that of the commercially available acrylic and porcelain shade guides. J Contemp Dent Pract 14(3):427–433
2. Tagtekin D, Yanikoglu F, Ozyoney G, Noyan N, Hayran O (2011) Clinical evaluation of a gingiva-coloured material, Comp Natur: a 3-year longitudinal study. Chin J Dent Res 14(1):59–66
3. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ, Mercante DE, Davidson JM (2005) Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials. Oper Dent 30(3):275–281
4. Balkenhol M, Huang J, Wostmann B, Hannig M (2007) Influence of solvent type in experimental dentin primer on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations. J Dent 35(11):836–844
5. Paravina RD, Westland S, Johnston WM, Powers JM (2008) Color adjustment potential of resin composites. J Dent Res 87(5):499–503
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献