Letter to the Editor in response to a “Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices” (Fraile et al., Clinical Oral Investigations https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021

Letter to the Editor in response to a “Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices” (Fraile et al., Clinical Oral Investigations https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021–04174-2)

Published:2022-05-17 Issue:6 Volume:26 Page:4669-4671
ISSN:1436-3771
Container-title:Clinical Oral Investigations
language:en
Short-container-title:Clin Oral Invest

Author:

Sutter Ben A.,Radke John

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Dentistry

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-022-04550-6.pdf

Reference17 articles.

1. Kerstein RB, Lowe M, Harty M, Radke J (2006) A force reproduction analysis of two recording sensors of a computerized occlusal analysis system. J Craniomandib Pract 24(1):15–24

2. Koos B, Godt A, Schille C, Goz G (2010) Precision of an instrumentation-based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch. J Orofac Orthop 71:403–410

3. Koos B, Holler J, Schille C, Godt A (2012) Time-dependent analysis and representation of force distribution and occlusion contact in the masticatory cycle. J Orofac Orthop 73:204–214

4. da Silva Martins MJ, Caramelo FJ, Ramalho da Fonseca JA, Gomes Nicolau PM (2014) In vitro study on the sensibility and reproducibility of the new T-Scan® III HD system. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial 55:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.01.001

5. Qadeer S, Ozcan M, Edelhoff D, Van Pelt H (2021) Accuracy, reliability and clinical implications of static compared to quantifiable occlusal indicators. Eur J Prostho Rest Dent. https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2202Qadeer12