Author:
Achterrath Sarah,Graf Isabelle,Guevara Romeo,Braumann Bert,Kruse Teresa
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To identify predictors for long-term relapse of orthodontic therapy in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP).
Materials and methods
Patients with uni- and bilateral non-syndromal CLP were followed up at least two years after completion of their orthodontic therapy. Plaster casts of the start of treatment (T1), after completion of treatment (T2), and at follow-up (T3) were measured using the modified Huddart Bodenham Index. Characteristics of multidisciplinary therapy were taken from the patient files. Potentially influencing factors of relapse were investigated using logistic regression analyses and Spearman correlations.
Results
In total 58.07% of the included 31 patients showed a stable treatment outcome at follow-up after an average of 6.9 years. Even if relapse occurred, 61.54% of these patients still showed improvement regarding their occlusion compared to baseline. Predictors for the occurrence of relapse were the severity of dysgnathia at baseline (p = 0.039) and the extent of therapeutic change (p = 0.041). The extent of therapeutic change was additionally a predictor for the extent of post-therapeutic relapse (ρ = 0.425; p = 0.019).
Conclusions
Patients with CLP benefit from their orthodontic therapy in the long term despite an increased tendency to relapse.
Clinical relevance
Results of this long-term study could be used to adapt the treatment concept for patients with CLP and reinforce the significance of a patient-centered orthodontic treatment concept for affected patients.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Mangold E, Ludwig KU, Nöthen MM (2011) Breakthroughs in the genetics of orofacial clefting. Trends Mol Med 17:725–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2011.07.007
2. Chen YH, Liao YF, Chang CS, Lu TC, Chen KT (2021) Patient satisfaction and quality of life after orthodontic treatment for cleft lip and palate deformity. Clin Oral Investig 25:5521–5529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03861-4
3. Ruiz-Guillén A, Suso-Ribera C, Romero-Maroto M, Gallardo C, Peñacoba C (2021) Perception of quality of life by children and adolescents with cleft lip/palate after orthodontic and surgical treatment: gender and age analysis. Prog Orthod 22:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00354-8
4. Roguzińska S, Pelc A, Mikulewicz M (2020) Orthodontic-care burden for patients with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Dent Med Probl 57:411–416. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/125874
5. Vaiciunaite R, Mitalauskiene A, Vasiliauskas A (2020) The relationship between congenital cleft lip and palate malformation, skeletal and dental occlusal anomalies, and the influence of its treatment on affected patients’ oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Stomatologija 22:116–119