Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the force delivered by removable thermoplastic appliances (RTAs, aligners), altered with Hilliard precision thermopliers, on an upper central incisor to tip it in the palatal and vestibular directions.
Materials and methods
A total of 10 aligners made from Ideal Clear® (polyethylene terephthalate glycol copolyester, PET-G) with a thickness of 1 mm were used in force analysis. Different-sized spot-thermoformed protuberances (bumps) were generated by activating the thermoplier (thin and thick) up to 30°, 60° and 90° in the centre of the palatal and vestibular surfaces of the aligner in 15° steps. The tipping (Fx) and intrusive (Fz) force components were measured on the isolated upper central incisor as part of a standardized resin model, with or without vertical loading by a weight equivalent.
Results
Thermoplier activation at 30°, 60° and 90° resulted in different bump heights. The analysis revealed significantly higher Fx and Fz values with increasing bump heights for every activation step in all cases (p < 0.0001, respectively). Overall, the values of the Fx force component were higher than those observed for Fz. Significant differences between the palatal and vestibular tipping procedures were found depending on the resulting force components when the thin thermoplier was used; in contrast, the thick thermoplier resulted in a larger dispersion of the force magnitudes.
Conclusions
Aligners modified with Hilliard precision thermopliers showed altered biomechanical parameters. This approach could be an option for treatment modification.
Clinical relevance
The instrumental examination provided informative results for daily practice, as activation, force dosage and different force values under chewing pressure can be estimated more precisely based on the determined force levels.
Funder
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Barbagallo LJ, Jones AS, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA (2008) Physical properties of root cementum: Part 10. Comparison of the effects of invisible removable thermoplastic appliances with light and heavy orthodontic forces on premolar cementum. A microcomputed-tomography study. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 133:218–227
2. Boyd RL (2009) Periodontal and restorative considerations with clear aligner treatment to establish a more favorable restorative environment. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J.: 1995) 30:280–2, 284, 286–8 passim
3. Lagravère MO, Flores-Mir C (2005) The treatment effects of Invisalign orthodontic aligners: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 136:1724–1729
4. Nedwed V, Miethke R-R (2005) Motivation, acceptance and problems of invisalign patients. Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie: Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie 66:162–173
5. Simon M, Keilig L, Schwarze J, Jung BA, Bourauel C (2014) Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique–regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization. BMC Oral Health 14:68
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献