Author:
Ellis Rebecca,Chen Stephen,Guzón Fernando Mª Muñoz,Darby Ivan
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to assess membrane use with a bone substitute graft for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in experimental dehiscence defects.
Materials and methods
Maxillary second incisors (I2) in 9 dogs were extracted. Six weeks later, implants were inserted and experimental dehiscence defects (5 × 3 mm) created on the buccal aspect. The defects and surrounding bone were grafted with deproteinized bovine bone mineral. One side (test) was covered with a resorbable collagen membrane whereas the contralateral side (control) was not. After 6 weeks, histomorphometrical analysis was performed to evaluate: (a) first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC), (b) buccal bone thickness at 1 mm increments from implant shoulder, (c) regenerated area (RA), (d) area and percentages of new bone (B), bone substitute (BS) and mineralized tissue (MT).
Results
The histological appearance was similar between test and control sites. At central and lateral sections, there were no differences between groups for fBIC, buccal bone thickness, RA, BS, B, %B, MT and %MT. At central sections, membrane use favoured more %BS and %MT (p = 0.052). There was significantly more B, %B and MT at lateral compared to central sections.
Conclusions
Membrane use tended to retain more bone substitute, but had no effect on new bone ingrowth. Lateral sections showed significantly more bone ingrowth and mineralized tissue compared to central sections, confirming that new bone ingrowth takes place mainly from the lateral walls of the defect.
Clinical relevance
Preclinical research to clarify the dynamics of bone regeneration in GBR procedures is relevant in clinical practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Laney WR (2007) Glossary of oral and maxillofacial implants. Quintessence Publishing Co, Ltd., Berlin
2. Buser D, Chen ST, Weber HP, Belser UC (2008) Early implant placement following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: biologic rationale and surgical procedures. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 28:441–451
3. Jensen SS, Bosshardt DD, Buser D (2009) Bone grafts and bone substitute materials. In: Buser D (ed) Book title, 2nd edn. Quintessence Publishing Co., Hanover Park, IL, USA
4. Kasuya S, Kato-Kogoe N, Omori M, Yamamoto K, Taguchi S, Fujita H, Imagawa N, Sunano A, Inoue K, Ito Y, Hirata A, Ueno T, Moy PK (2018) New bone formation process using bio-oss and collagen membrane for rat calvarial bone defect: histological observation. Implant Dent 27:158–164. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000738
5. Bornstein M, Von Arx T, Schenk R (2009) Properties of barrier membranes. In: Buser D (ed) Book title, 2nd edn. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, Chicago