Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To compare the failure rates for three different adhesively retained core build-up composites up to the incorporation of a permanent fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), and to identify potential failure risk factors.
Material and methods
A randomized controlled trial of 300 participants in need of a core build-up to restore a vital abutment tooth before prosthetic treatment was conducted. Participants were assigned by stratified block randomization to one of three study groups: Rebilda DC (RDC), Clearfil DC Core (CDC), or Multicore Flow (MF). Test teeth were prepared by use of the respective manufacturer’s adhesive system. The total-etch technique was used for RDC and MF, and the self-etch technique for CDC. Participants were treated by dentists (n = 150) or dental students (n = 150). Failure rates of core build-ups before incorporation of FDPs were investigated using univariate and multiple logistic regression.
Results
The overall failure rate was 8% (n = 23). Rate differences between the three investigated groups did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean time between placement of core build-ups and placement of fixed dental prostheses was 12.2 (SD: 14.2) weeks. Conversely, larger cavities (> 3 surfaces) and treatment by dental students were independently associated with an increased failure risk (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
The main risk factors for early failure seem to be the size of the core build-up and clinical experience of the operator, whereas failure rates of core build-up materials combined with a self-etch approach seem to be similar to the rates of materials combined with the total-etch technique.
Clinical significance
This research article should give clinicians an impression of the short-term performance of different adhesively retained core build-ups using different adhesive techniques/materials. Moreover, predominant influencing factors for the success or failure should be pictured.
Funder
Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg der Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. O’Mahony A, Spencer P (1999) Core build-up materials and techniques. J Ir Dent Assoc 45:84–90
2. Wilson PW, Fisher NL, Bartlett DW (2002) Direct cores for vital teeth–materials and methods used to retain cores in vital teeth. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 10:157–162
3. Fokkinga WA, Fennis WMM, Witter DJ, Kreulen CM, Creugers NHJ (2013) Build-up restorations after extensive loss of tooth tissue. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 120:81–90. https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2013.02.12259 [Article in Dutch]
4. Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer HC, Büchler A (2002) Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites. J Prosthodont 11:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1053/jopr.2002.124545
5. Rüttermann S, Alberts I, Raab WH, Janda RR (2011) Physical properties of self-, dual-, and light-cured direct core materials. Clin Oral Investig 15:597–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0405-y
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献