Author:
Kniha Kristian,Haas Lorenz,Al-Sibai Faruk,Kneer Reinhold,Möhlhenrich Stephan Christian,Hermanns-Sachweh Benita,Hölzle Frank,Modabber Ali
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether thermal implant removal of osseointegrated implants is possible using a diode laser with an specific temperature–time interval.
Materials and methods
First, tooth extraction of the first three premolars was performed in the maxilla and mandible on both sides of 10 pig. After 3 months, implants were inserted into the upper and lower jaws of 10 pigs. After 3 more months, osseointegrated implants were heated with a laser device to a temperature of 50 °C for 1 min. After 14 days, the implant stability quotient (ISQ), torque-out values, and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) ratio were assessed using resonance frequency analysis.
Results
ISQ values showed no significant differences within each group or between the control and test groups. Furthermore, torque-out and BIC value measurements presented no significant differences between the groups.
Conclusions
At 50°C, changes in the BIC values were noticeably smaller; however, these differences were not significant. Future studies should evaluate the same procedures at either a higher temperature or longer intervals.
Clinical relevance
With only 50 °C for 1 min, a dental implant will not de-integrate predictably.
Funder
This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy
Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Ohman A (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 16:1–132
2. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström C, van Steenberghe D (1999) Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(639):45
3. Cosola S, Toti P, Babetto E, Covani U, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D (2021) In-vitro fatigue and fracture performance of three different ferrulized implant connections used in fixed prosthesis (in eng). J Dent Sci 16:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.08.002
4. Bernabeu-Mira JC, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Romero-Gavilán F, Camacho-Alonso F, Peñarrocha-Oltra D (2024) Comparison of patient-centered outcomes measures between low-speed drilling without irrigation and high-speed drilling with irrigation: A randomized clinical trial (in eng). Clin Oral Implant Res 35:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14189
5. PW (1997) History, development, and current status ofosseointegration as revealed by experience in craniomaxillofacialsurgery. In: Brånemark P-I, Rydevik BL, Skalak R (eds) Carol Stream. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and joint replacement. Quintessence Publishing Co, IL, pp 25–44