Author:
Hotic Merima,Ackermann Mario,Bopp Joshua,Hofmann Norbert,Karygianni Lamprini,Paqué Pune Nina
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Sonic toothbrushes generate hydrodynamic shear forces for oral biofilm removal on tooth surfaces, but the effective thresholds for biofilm removal remain unexplored. This in vitro study aimed to investigate various threshold values for hydrodynamic biofilm removal in vitro.
Materials and methods
A specialized test bench was designed with a known water flow field within a gap, ensuring that hydrodynamic shear forces on the wall were solely dependent on the volume flow, which was quantifiable using an integrated flow meter and proven by a computational fluid dynamics simulation. A young 20 h supragingival six-species biofilm was developed on hydroxyapatite disks (∅ 5 mm) and applied into the test bench, subjecting them to ascending force levels ranging from 0 to 135 Pa. The remaining biofilms were quantified using colony forming units (CFU) and subjected to statistical analysis through one-way ANOVA.
Results
Volume flow measures < 0.1 l/s: Error 1% of reading were established with the test bench. Untreated biofilms (0 Pa, no hydrodynamic shear forces) reached 7.7E7 CFU/harvest and differed significantly from all treated biofilm groups. CFU reductions of up to 2.3E6 were detected using 20 Pa, and reductions of two orders of magnitude were reached above wall shear forces of 45 Pa (6.9E5).
Conclusions
Critical hydrodynamic force levels of at least 20 Pa appear to be necessary to have a discernible impact on initial biofilm removal.
Clinical relevance
Pure hydrodynamic forces alone are insufficient for adequate biofilm removal. The addition of antiseptics is essential to penetrate and disrupt hydrodynamically loosened biofilm structures effectively.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Adams H, Winston MT, Heersink J, Buckingham-Meyer KA, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2002) Development of a laboratory model to assess the removal of biofilm from interproximal spaces by powered tooth brushing. Am J Dent. 15 Spec No:12B-17B.
2. Amarasena N, Gnanamanickam ES, Miller J (2019) Effects of interdental cleaning devices in preventing dental caries and periodontal diseases: a scoping review. Aust Dent J 64(4):327–337
3. Carr VR, Shkoporov A, Hill C, Mullany P, Moyes DL (2021) Probing the mobilome: discoveries in the dynamic microbiome. Trends Microbiol 29(2):158–170
4. Cvikl B, Lussi A (2021) Supragingival biofilm: Toothpaste and toothbrushes. Monogr Oral Sci 29:65–73
5. de Lacerda Vidal CF, Vidal AK, Monteiro JG Jr., Cavalcanti A, Henriques APC, Oliveira M, Godoy M, Coutinho M, Sobral PD, Vilela C et al (2017) Impact of oral hygiene involving toothbrushing versus chlorhexidine in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomized study. BMC Infect Dis 17(1):112