Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The study evaluates the influence of two spacer settings and three resin luting materials on the marginal and internal fit of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) material crowns manufactured using a complete digital workflow.
Methods
Optical impressions of fifty identical dies were performed using the 3M scanner (software version 5.0.2). Twenty crowns were designed using Ceramill Mind (version 3.4.10.1163), from which ten with spacer setting of 50 μm (G1) and ten with 80 μm (G2). Thirty crowns (spacer setting of 50 μm) were divided into three groups corresponding to the resin materials used as follows: RelyX Unicem (RX), Variolink Esthetic (VLE), and Nexus 3 (NX3). All crowns were milled from Vita Enamic blocks. After micro-CT scanning, absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), internal gap (IG), total cement space volume (TCV), and marginal porosities (VP) were measured.
Results
Significant difference was detected on the VP between the RX and NX3 group (p = 0.033). The mean values of all parameters were the following: AMD (μm): G1 182.6, G2 253.7, RX 210.8, VLE 195.5, NX3 186.6; IG (μm): G1 215.6, G2 173.1, RX 171.1, VLE 198.6, NX3 203; TCV (mm3): G1 22.9, G2 20.49, RX 17.57, VLE 17.49, NX3 20.59; VP (mm3): G1 0.26, G2 0.34, RX 0.32, VLE 0.46, NX3 0.54.
Conclusions
Fit of PICN material crowns was not significantly influenced by increasing the spacer settings and cementation with different resin materials. Additionally, RelyX Unicem showed significantly less porosities as compared with Nexus3.
Clinical relevance
Both 50 μm and 80 μm virtual spacer settings can be suggested for the manufacture of PICN crowns when Ceramill Mind (version 3.4.10.1163) is used. Furthermore, a self-adhesive system can be recommended for the cementation.
Funder
Medical University of Vienna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Reich S (2013) New CAD/CAM materials and blocks for chairside procedures. Int J Comput Dent 16(2):173–181
2. Kurbad A, Kurbad S (2013) A new, hybrid material for minimally invasive restorations in clinical use. Int J Comput Dent 16(1):69–79
3. Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ (2016) From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: state of the art of indirect composites. J Dent Res 95(5):487–495.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516634286
4. Furtado de Mendonca A, Shahmoradi M, Gouvea CVD, De Souza GM, Ellakwa A (2019) Microstructural and mechanical characterization of CAD/CAM materials for monolithic dental restorations. J Prosthodont 28(2):e587–e594.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12964
5. Awada A, Nathanson D (2015) Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 114(4):587–593.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献