Morphometric micro-CT study of contralateral mandibular incisors

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to determine the degree of similarity and symmetry in the anatomy of contralateral mandibular incisors. Three-dimensional (3D) models of extracted teeth were obtained from microtomography (micro-CT) scans. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of the morphology and comparison of contralateral pairs were made. The null hypothesis was that contralateral mandibular incisors could not be considered identical in simple morphometric measurements. Methods Sixty pairs of mandibular incisors were extracted from 30 patients and scanned with micro-CT. Virtual models of the cemento-enamel junction to the root apex were rendered. Parameters such as length, canal width, dentinal thicknesses, tortuosity, centerline length, accessory canals, root canal configurations, and root canal orifice cross-sections were used to compare the teeth. Width and thickness comparisons between paired teeth in the same individual were made by paired t-test (Wilcoxon signed-rank test for variables not normally distributed). An online randomization tool generated randomized pairs (independent of the individual/patient). Subsequently, an unpaired t-test (or Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed parameters) and a correlation analysis were conducted. Canal configurations were classified according to preexisting classification schemes. The number and location of accessory canals and apical foramina were registered and compared. Results Utilizing advanced imaging techniques and quantitative analyses, our study establishes that contralateral mandibular incisors exhibit a remarkable degree of symmetry in multiple morphological parameters, including length, canal width, and dentinal thicknesses. The apical third showed a high degree of inter-variability for the contralateral pairs. The rigorous statistical analysis of the normalized parameters by Z-score showed no statistically significant differences between the contralateral mandibular incisors. Comparisons between central and lateral teeth revealed differences in root length but no significant disparity in the distribution of accessory canals. Central teeth, on average, were longer, while accessory canals were distributed relatively evenly between central and lateral teeth. Conclusions The findings of this study further establish the significant similarities between contralateral mandibular incisors, reinforcing their suitability as a reliable substrate for root canal comparison studies. Clinical relevance The absence of statistically significant differences between contralateral pairs in normalized parameters underscores their potential as a reliable reference point for root canal comparison studies in clinical dentistry. Furthermore, our findings emphasize the importance of individualized treatment planning, considering the natural symmetry in mandibular incisors to enhance clinical decision-making. This research contributes valuable insights to the field of endodontics, offering a standardized approach to sample selection and enriching the understanding of dental anatomy.