Author:
Baer Russell A.,Nölken Robert,Colic Snjezana,Heydecke Guido,Mirzakhanian Christine,Behneke Alexandra,Behneke Nikolaus,Gottesman Edward,Ottria Liliana,Pozzi Alessandro,Fügl Alexander,Zechner Werner
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This open, single-cohort, multicenter, prospective study investigated the efficacy of immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implant for single-tooth restorations in the anterior and premolar regions of the maxilla after 5 years of function.
Materials and methods
All implants were placed in healed sites and immediately provisionalized. MBLs, soft-tissue parameters, and oral-health impact profile (OHIP) were evaluated at implant insertion, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used for statistical and implant survival/success analyses, respectively.
Results
Seventy-seven patients (81 implants) completed the 5-year follow-up. The 5-year cumulative survival and success rates were 97.8%, and the mean MBL change from implant insertion to 5 years was − 0.80 ± 1.13 mm. Optimal papilla index scores were observed at 90.1% of sites at 5 years compared with 32.8% of sites at insertion. Pink esthetic score, modified bleeding and plaque indices, and OHIP showed statistically significant improvement at the 5-year follow-up.
Conclusions
Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants promote marginal bone stability and excellent esthetic outcomes after 5 years of function.
Clinical relevance
This treatment is a viable option for patients requiring immediately provisionalized single-tooth restorations in the esthetic zone and shows favorable long-term clinical outcomes, including marginal bone stability and excellent esthetics.
Funder
Nobel Biocare Services AG grant number T-179.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS (2012) Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:2–21
2. Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D (2009) Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol 80:140–151
3. Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM (2005) A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues–the implant crown aesthetic index. Clin Oral Implants Res 16:645–649
4. Balasubramaniam AS, Raja SV, Thomas LJ (2013) Peri-implant esthetics assessment and management. Dental research journal 10:7–14
5. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S (2000) Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2017(73):84–102
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献