Author:
Tabellion Maike,Linsenmann Constanze Charlotte,Lisson Jörg Alexander
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Patients with a cleft require structured procedures to achieve feasible treatment results. Since many treatment protocols coexist without being superior to one another, this study investigated the Saarland University Hospital treatment concept for patients with unilateral and bilateral clefts to evaluate its effects upon dental arch dimensions until the early mixed dentition.
Material and methods
Digitized plaster models were used for data collection. Records of 83 patients (Cleft n = 41 [UCLP n = 28, BCLP n = 13], Non-Cleft Control n = 42) comprised 249 casts. The evaluation included established procedures for measurements of edentulous and dentate jaws. Statistics included Shapiro–Wilk, Friedmann, Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney-U-Tests for the casts. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
The cast analysis showed an approximation of arch dimensions towards those of age-matched patients without a cleft until early mixed dentition. The mean values of patients with and without cleft lip and palate were almost indistinguishable when compared in primary and/or early mixed dentition.
Conclusions
The evaluated treatment concept leads to feasible outcomes regarding dental arches in patients with unilateral and bilateral clefts compared to an age-matched non-cleft control.
Clinical relevance
The evaluated treatment concept leads to favorable outcomes until early mixed dentition.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Aduss H, Pruzansky S (1968) Width of the cleft at level of the tuberosities in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 4:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196802000-00003
2. Al-Nawas B, Wriedt S, Wehrbein H, Wagner W, Keilmann A (2007) Die zeitgerechte Versorgung von Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten. Pädiat Prax 69:685–697
3. Athanasiou AE, Mazaheri M, Zarrinnia K (1988) Dental arch dimension in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 25:139–145
4. Batra P, Datana S, Arora A (2022) Presurgical infant orthopedics: a developmental and clinical evolution. J Cleft Lip Palate Craniofac Anomal 101–109. https://doi.org/10.4103/jclpca.jclpca_40_21
5. Biber D (2014) Pränatale Entwicklung der orofazialen Strukturen. In: Frühkindliche Dysphagien und Trinkschwächen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin