Abstract
Abstract
Familiar strangers—individuals related through regular and repeated visual encounter occurring without verbal interaction—may reduce the risk of crime at places by increasing guardianship and internal motivation for norm compliance. This study examines the association between familiar stranger presence and incidents of theft and disorder at train stations using transit smart card and crime data for 22 stations across a six-month period. Familiar strangers are operationally defined as individual transit cards that are co-present within a 30-min temporal window on more than two occasions across a one-month period at a given train station. We apply logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of disorder and theft crimes within a 400-m radius of train stations controlling for station environmental features, co-located facilities and neighbourhood socio-demographic characteristics. Our results show that the impact of familiar strangers on crime (disorder and theft) at train stations is moderated by the neighbourhood socio-demographic context. This may suggest that macro-level norms of informal social control are important for determining crime at micro-places such as transit stations. The findings also indicate that urban design and transport policies require greater flexibility to enable intra-network variability in station design and formal security to enhance ridership.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Reference61 articles.
1. Adams, W., Herrmann, C. R., & Felson, M. (2015). Crime, transportation and malignant mixes. In Safety and Security in Transit Environments (pp. 181–195). Springer.
2. Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2013). Crime seasonality and its variations across space. Applied Geography, 43, 25–35.
3. Australia Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Regional population: Statistics about the population and components of change (births, deaths, migration) for Australia's capital cities and regions. Retrieved 10/10/2020 from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/regional-population/2018-19
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). 2016 Census data- Austalian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved 10/10/2020 from https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/2016
5. Bowers, K. (2014). Risky facilities: Crime radiators or crime absorbers? A comparison of internal and external levels of theft. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-013-9208-z
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献