Abstract
AbstractFailure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is an important risk analysis tool that has been widely used in diverse areas to manage risk factors. However, how to manage the uncertainty in FMEA assessments is still an open issue. In this paper, a novel FMEA model based on the improved pignistic probability transformation function in Dempster–Shafer evidence theory (DST) and grey relational projection method (GRPM) is proposed to improve the accuracy and reliability in risk analysis with FMEA. The basic probability assignment (BPA) function in DST is used to model the assessments of experts with respect to each risk factor. Dempster’s rule of combination is adopted for fusion of assessment information from different experts. The improved pignistic probability function is proposed and used to transform the fusion result of BPA into probability function for getting more accurate decision-making result in risk analysis with FMEA. GRPM is adopted to determine the risk priority order of all the failure modes to overcome the shortcoming in traditional risk priority number in FMEA. Applications in aircraft turbine rotor blades and steel production process are presented to show the rationality and generality of the proposed method.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China
NWPU Research Fund for Young Scholars
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Artificial Intelligence
Reference71 articles.
1. Huang J, You J-X, Liu H-C, Song M-S (2020) Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 199:106885
2. Liu Z, Mou X, Liu H-C, Zhang L (2021) Failure mode and effect analysis based on probabilistic linguistic preference relations and gained and lost dominance score method. IEEE Trans Cybern
3. Shi H, Liu Z, Liu H-C (2022) A new linguistic preference relation-based approach for failure mode and effect analysis with dynamic consensus reaching process. Inform Sci 610:977–993
4. Zhu J-H, Chen Z-S, Shuai B, Pedrycz W, Chin K-S, Martinez Luis (2021) Failure mode and effect analysis: a three-way decision approach. Eng Appl Artif Intell 106:104505
5. Rouabhia-Essalhi R, Boukrouh EH, Ghemari Y (2022) Application of failure mode effect and criticality analysis to industrial handling equipment. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 120(7–8):5269–5280
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献