Abstract
AbstractFederated learning (FL) draws attention in academia and industry due to its privacy-preserving capability in training machine learning models. However, there are still some critical security attacks and vulnerabilities, including gradients leakage and interference attacks. Meanwhile, communication is another bottleneck in basic FL schemes since large-scale FL parameter transmission leads to inefficient communication, latency, and slower learning processes. To overcome these shortcomings, different communication efficiency strategies and privacy-preserving cryptographic techniques have been proposed. However, a single method can only partially resist privacy attacks. This paper presents a practical, privacy-preserving scheme combining cryptographic techniques and communication networking solutions. We implement Kafka for message distribution, the Diffie–Hellman scheme for secure server aggregation, and gradient differential privacy for interference attack prevention. The proposed approach maintains training efficiency while being able to addressing gradients leakage problems and interference attacks. Meanwhile, the implementation of Kafka and Zookeeper provides asynchronous communication and anonymous authenticated computation with role-based access controls. Finally, we prove the privacy-preserving properties of the proposed solution via security analysis and empirically demonstrate its efficiency and practicality.
Funder
EIT Digital
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Artificial Intelligence
Reference42 articles.
1. Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, Chen Z, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Ghemawat S, Irving G, Isard M, et al (2016) $$\{$$TensorFlow$$\}$$: a system for $$\{$$Large-Scale$$\}$$ machine learning. In: 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16). pp. 265–283
2. Abadi M, Chu A, Goodfellow I, McMahan HB, Mironov I, Talwar K, Zhang L (2016) Deep learning with differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. ACM, pp 308–318
3. Annas GJ (2003) Hipaa regulations: a new era of medical-record privacy? N Engl J Med 348:1486
4. Arachchige PCM, Bertok P, Khalil I, Liu D, Camtepe S, Atiquzzaman M (2019) Local differential privacy for deep learning. IEEE Internet Things J 7(7):5827–5842
5. Beutel DJ, Topal T, Mathur A, Qiu X, Parcollet T, de Gusmão PP, Lane ND (2020) Flower: a friendly federated learning research framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.14390
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献