Abstract
AbstractThe term ‘quantum technology’ was first popularised by an Australian physicist in the mid-1990s. These technologies make use of the properties of quantum physics and are being developed and invested across the world, yet this emerging technology is understudied in science and technology studies. This article investigates the emergence of the notion of ‘quantum technologies’ and examines the expectations shaping this field through an analysis of research grants funded by a national research funder, the Australian Research Council between 2002 and 2020. I examine how ‘quantum technology’ and ‘quantum computing’ have come to dominate claims and expectations surrounding research in quantum science. These expectations do more than inform the scientific goals of the field. They also provide an overarching, uniting rhetoric for individual projects and people and shape the uses imagined for quantum technologies. This analysis shows how claims for this emerging technology draw on ‘breakthrough’ metaphors to engage researchers and marshal investment and concludes by highlighting the need for increased clarity regarding expectations for quantum technologies.
Funder
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education
Reference69 articles.
1. Adams, Vincanne, Michelle Murphy, and Adele E. Clarke. 2009. Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect and temporality. Subjectivity 28: 246–265.
2. Apreda, Riccardo, Andrea Bonaccorsi, Gualtiero Fantoni, and Donata Gabelloni. 2014. Functions and failures: how to manage technological promises for societal challenges. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26(4): 369–384.
3. Arribas-Ayllon, Michael, Andrew Bartlett, and Katie Featherstone. 2010. Complexity and accountability: The witches’ brew of psychiatric genetics. Social Studies of Science 40(4): 499–524.
4. Barlösius, Eva. 2018. Begrenzt gewagte Heterodoxie: Originalität ohne Risiko. Eine Studie über
5. Forschungsanträge. In Heterodoxie. Konzepte, Traditionen, Figuren der Abweichung, eds. M. Schetsche, and I. Schmied-Knittel, 99-116. Köln: Herbert von Harlem.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Assessing the journey of technology hype in the field of quantum technology;TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis;2023-12-13
2. Corporate Digital Responsibility and the Business Implications of Quantum Computing;Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research;2023-12-07
3. Quantum Technology: Unleashing the Power and Shaping the Future of Cybersecurity;2023 Eight Junior Conference on Lighting (Lighting);2023-09-23
4. A Holistic Approach to Quantum Ethics Education;2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE);2023-09-17
5. Ethics and Robot Democratization: Reflecting on Integrative Ethics Practices;International Journal of Social Robotics;2023-05-22