Abstract
AbstractThe term ‘quantum technology’ was first popularised by an Australian physicist in the mid-1990s. These technologies make use of the properties of quantum physics and are being developed and invested across the world, yet this emerging technology is understudied in science and technology studies. This article investigates the emergence of the notion of ‘quantum technologies’ and examines the expectations shaping this field through an analysis of research grants funded by a national research funder, the Australian Research Council between 2002 and 2020. I examine how ‘quantum technology’ and ‘quantum computing’ have come to dominate claims and expectations surrounding research in quantum science. These expectations do more than inform the scientific goals of the field. They also provide an overarching, uniting rhetoric for individual projects and people and shape the uses imagined for quantum technologies. This analysis shows how claims for this emerging technology draw on ‘breakthrough’ metaphors to engage researchers and marshal investment and concludes by highlighting the need for increased clarity regarding expectations for quantum technologies.
Funder
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education
Reference69 articles.
1. Adams, Vincanne, Michelle Murphy, and Adele E. Clarke. 2009. Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect and temporality. Subjectivity 28: 246–265.
2. Apreda, Riccardo, Andrea Bonaccorsi, Gualtiero Fantoni, and Donata Gabelloni. 2014. Functions and failures: how to manage technological promises for societal challenges. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26(4): 369–384.
3. Arribas-Ayllon, Michael, Andrew Bartlett, and Katie Featherstone. 2010. Complexity and accountability: The witches’ brew of psychiatric genetics. Social Studies of Science 40(4): 499–524.
4. Barlösius, Eva. 2018. Begrenzt gewagte Heterodoxie: Originalität ohne Risiko. Eine Studie über
5. Forschungsanträge. In Heterodoxie. Konzepte, Traditionen, Figuren der Abweichung, eds. M. Schetsche, and I. Schmied-Knittel, 99-116. Köln: Herbert von Harlem.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献