Abstract
AbstractThis article compares the career trajectories and mobility patterns of Nobel Laureates in economics with those of highly cited sociologists to evaluate a theory advanced by Richard Whitley that postulates a nexus between the overall intellectual structure of a discipline and the composition of its elite. The theory predicts that the most eminent scholars in internally fragmented disciplines such as sociology will vary in their departmental affiliations and academic career paths, while disciplines such as economics with strong linkages between specialties and shared standards of excellence will be dominated by a more homogeneous elite. The comparison provides strong empirical evidence in favor of Whitley’s theory. The careers of the most eminent economists are closely tied to the top five departments of the discipline, whereas the career pathways to eminence in sociology are largely unpredictable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education
Reference50 articles.
1. Akers, Ronald L. 1992. Linking Sociology and Its Specialties: The Case of Criminology. Social Forces 71(1): 1–16.
2. Amir, Rabah, and Malgorzata Knauff. 2008. Ranking economics departments worldwide on the basis of PhD placement. The Review of Economics and Statistics 90(1): 185–190.
3. Bjork, Samuel, Avner Offer, and Gabriel Söderberg. 2014. Time Series Citation Data: The Nobel Prize in Economics. Scientometrics 98(1): 185–196.
4. Blaug, Mark (ed.). 1999. Who’s Who in Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.
5. Breit, William, and Barry T. Hirsch (eds.). 2009. Lives of the Laureates: Twenty-Three Nobel Economists. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献