The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects

Author:

Gläser JochenORCID,Ash Mitchell,Buenstorf GuidoORCID,Hopf David,Hubenschmid Lara,Janßen Melike,Laudel Grit,Schimank Uwe,Stoll Marlene,Wilholt Torsten,Zechlin Lothar,Lieb Klaus

Abstract

AbstractThe independence of research is a key strategic issue of modern societies. Dealing with it appropriately poses legal, economic, political, social and cultural problems for society, which have been studied by the corresponding disciplines and are increasingly the subject of reflexive discourses of scientific communities. Unfortunately, problems of independence are usually framed in disciplinary contexts without due consideration of other perspectives’ relevance or possible contributions. To overcome these limitations, we review disciplinary perspectives and findings on the independence of research and identify interdisciplinary prospects that could inform a research programme.

Funder

Volkswagen Foundation

Technische Universität Berlin

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Reference172 articles.

1. Acharya, A., and B. Buzan. 2017. Why is there no Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten years on. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcx006.

2. Ash, M.G. 1997. Higher Education and German Unification: “Renewal” or the Importation of Crisis? In German Universities Past and Future: Crisis or Renewal?, ed. Mitchell G. Ash, 84–109. Oxford, England and Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.

3. Ash, Mitchell G. 2008. Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Steps Towards A New Approach. In The Migration of Ideas, eds. Roberto Scazzieri and Raffaela Simili, 161–178. Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications.

4. Azoulay, Pierre, Waverly Ding, and Toby Stuart. 2009. The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output. The Journal of Industrial Economics 57: 637–676.

5. Baker, Monya. 2016. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3