Abstract
AbstractTextual data are the last frontier in the empirical literature on proximity between firms. While there are a growing number of studies using textual data, no robust methodology has yet emerged, nor has any attempt been made to compare the resulting findings with standard measures of proximity based on existing classification systems. The purpose of this paper is threefold. First, we propose a methodology that can be an effective and applicable tool for measuring proximity between companies. Second, we compare the resulting indicator of proximity, which we refer to as “business” proximity, with industrial and technological proximity scores based on activity codes and technology adoption, respectively. Third, we use business proximity to explain economic performance, assuming that knowledge sharing can occur between employees working in similar firms. Having established the soundness of the methodology, the empirical results confirm the substantial information content of the descriptive texts and provide evidence on the likelihood of spillover effects between firms that are close in the business and geographical dimension.
Funder
Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Verona Vicenza Belluno e Ancona
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., & Jakobsen, S. E. (2016). Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy, 45(4), 844–856.
2. Aica, Anitec-Assinform, Assintel, Assinter Italia. Osservatorio delle competenze digitali online. www.competenzedigitali.org; 2020.
3. Aldieri, L. (2013). Knowledge technological proximity: Evidence from US and European patents. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(8), 807–819.
4. Aldieri, L., Bruno, B., Senatore, L., Vinci, C. P. (2020). The future of pharmaceuticals industry within the Triad: The role of knowledge spillovers in innovation process. Futures, 122, 102600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102600
5. Anselin, L. (2010). Thirty years of spatial econometrics. Papers in Regional Science, 89, 3–25.