Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pulses are cultivated across a range of soil and climatic conditions that often have many abiotic constraints to production. Whilst water stress has been identified as the greatest constraint in Australian pulse cultivation, other limitations include heat, frost, nutrient deficiency, and a variety of soil physiochemical constraints. Several studies on various pulses have examined shoot and root architecture and their ability to mitigate specific abiotic constraints. However, these studies have been conducted independently of each other, and there is a lack of amalgamated information combining both shoot and root responses that can address production constraints.
Scope
This review examines the shoot and root system architecture of key pulses used for human consumption grown in Australia including chickpea, lentil, faba bean, field pea and lupin; and where possible it provides a comparison with relevant research from other crops, especially cereals. It examines research conducted on adaptations to drought, waterlogging, temperature extremes, soil chemical toxicities and high soil strength.
Conclusion
The review utilises a physiological framework to identify trait combinations that define theoretical ideotypes of pulse crops that would be better able to mitigate abiotic constraints currently limiting Australian pulse productivity. This framework can be extended directly to other similar environments globally or be used to develop new ideotypes that are better adapted to a wider range of regions within Australia.
Funder
Agriculture Victoria
Grains Research and Development Corporation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Plant Science,Soil Science
Reference219 articles.
1. Abdel-Haleem H, Carter TE Jr, Purcell LC, King CA, Ries LL, Chen P, Schapaugh W Jr, Sinclair TR, Boerma HR (2012) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for canopy-wilting trait in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). Theor Appl Genet 125:837–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1876-9
2. Adcock D, McNeill AM, McDonald GK, Armstrong RD (2007) Subsoil constraints to crop production on neutral and alkaline soils in south-eastern Australia: a review of current knowledge and management strategies. Aust J Exp Agric 47:1245–1261. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06250
3. Agriculture Victoria (2019a) Sodicity-upper subsoil. In: Victorian Resources Online. Agriculture Victoria. Available via https://vro.agriculture.vic.gov.au/dpi/vro/vrosite.nsf/pages/soil_soil-sodicity. Accessed 24 Oct 2022
4. Agriculture Victoria (2019b) Surface Soil pH. In: Victorian resources online. Agriculture Victoria Available via https://vro.agriculture.vic.gov.au/dpi/vro/vrosite.nsf/pages/vic-soil_surface-soil-ph_map. Accessed 24 Oct 2022
5. Agriculture Victoria (2019c) Victoria_catchement Management Authority (CMA) and salinity province (SP) areas. In: Victorian Resources Online. Agriculture Victoria. Available via https://vro.agriculture.vic.gov.au/dpi/vro/vrosite.nsf/pages/lwm_salinity-provinces. Accessed 24 Oct 2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献