Abstract
Abstract
Background
Evidence suggests that manipulating intercropping timing and stand density within intercropping systems could enhance crop yields. However, our current understanding of the effects of intercropping a cover crop on soil chemical properties and moisture still needs to be improved. This study investigates the effects of intercropping sunn hemp with maize at different timings and stand densities on selected soil properties and crop yield.
Materials and methods
A split-plot experiment was conducted under the in-field rainwater harvesting (IRWH) tillage. The trial had three intercropping times (simultaneously with maize planting, at V15 maize growth stage, and R1 maize growth stage) as the main plot factors and three stand densities (16, 32, and 48 plants m−2) as the subplot factors, with three replicates for both the 2019/20 and 2020/21 seasons. Changes in soil properties were assessed within the uppermost layer (0-30 cm). Soil moisture content was continuously monitored throughout the growing season and specific soil chemical properties were analyzed at harvest.
Results
The results showed that the interaction of sunn hemp intercropping period and stand densities did not significantly influence most of the measured soil properties. The early planting of sunn hemp had significantly 32.4% higher soil organic matter (SOM) than the last planting date at low stand density. After two growing seasons SOM, nitrogen, potassium, and manganese were significantly enhanced by 39.7%, 19.0%, 21% and 60.6% respectively. However, during the same period calcium, sodium and iron were significantly reduced by 13.4%, 46.1% and 78.0% respectively. The management of sunn hemp crop had significant effect on maize grain yield across the two seasons. The maize yields in the medium and high stand densities in the first season were significantly 15.3% and 34.3% higher than in the second season, respectively.
Conclusion
Due to the intercropping treatments, the retention of sunn hemp residues with varying quantities and qualities may have influenced the soil nutrient dynamics in the short-term. Significant changes in soil chemical properties and yield may need more time, and future research should be conducted out in agricultural regions with different soil mineral matrices.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Al-Seekh SH, Mohammad AG (2009) The effect of water harvesting techniques on runoff, sedimentation, and soil properties. Environ Manag 44(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9310-z
2. Amossé C, Jeuffroy MH, David C (2013) Relay intercropping of legume cover crops in organic winter wheat: Effects on performance and resource availability. Field Crop Res 145:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.010
3. Berti M, Samarappuli D, Johnson BL, Gesch RW (2017) Integrating winter camelina into maize and soybean cropping systems. Ind Crop Prod 107:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.06.014
4. Borghi E, Crusciol CAC, Mateus GP, Nascente AS, Martins PO (2013) Intercropping time of corn and palisade grass or guinea grass affecting grain yield and forage production. Crop Sci 53(2):629–636. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.08.0469
5. Botha JJ, Anderson JJ, Macheli M, van Rensburg LD, Van Staden PP (2003) Water conservation techniques on small plots in semi-arid areas to increase crop yields. In Proceedings of symposium/workshop on water conservation technologies for sustainable dryland agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa, vol 811. Bloemfontein, South Africa, pp 127133