Factors Associated with Suspected Developmental Delay in Thai Children Born with Low Birth Weight or Asphyxia
-
Published:2023-11-08
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1092-7875
-
Container-title:Maternal and Child Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Matern Child Health J
Author:
Tangviriyapaiboon Duangkamol, Thaineua Vallop, Sirithongthaworn Samai, Kanshana Siripon, Damrongtamwattana Siriwat, Prasitwattanaseree Sukon, Srikummoon Pimwarat, Thongsak Natthapat, Thumronglaohapun Salinee, Traisathit PatrineeORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with a risk of suspected developmental delay (SDD) in high-risk children in Thailand.
Methods
We used data on children enrolled for developmental delay (DD) screening across Thailand collected by the Rajanagarindra Institute of Child Development, Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Children who were under 5 years of age with a birth weight of fewer than 2500 g and/or birth asphyxia in Thailand with high risk of DD were assessed using the Developmental Assessment for Intervention Manual (DAIM) between August 2013 and November 2019 (N = 14,314).
Results
The high-risk children who had a gestational age at birth of < 37 weeks (adjusted odds ratio = 1.54; 95% confidence interval = 1.39–1.70) and/or had a birth weight < 2500 g (1.22; 1.02–1.45), or had mothers who were not government officers (1.46; 1.11–1.93), had a low education level (1.36; 1.19–1.55), had a poor nutritional status (1.34; 1.09–1.65), and/or who were living in a high-altitude area (1.59; 1.32–1.91) were at a higher risk of SDD.
Conclusions for Practice
Children with a low birth weight and/or asphyxia during birth had a high risk of DD. SDD monitoring of children by community health workers and/or by developing outreach strategies, especially in underserved regions, should be considered. In addition, developing policies and guidelines, and intervention for high-risk children ought to be conducted to reduce the subsequent problems caused by the late detection of DD.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health,Epidemiology
Reference40 articles.
1. Black, M. M., Walker, S. P., Fernald, L. C., Andersen, C. T., DiGirolamo, A. M., Lu, C., McCoy, D. C., Fink, G., Shawar, Y. R., Shiffman, J., & Devercelli, A. E. (2017). Early childhood development coming of age: Science through the life course. Lancet, 389(10064), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31389-7 2. Chunsuwan, I., Hansakunachai, T., & Pornsamrit, S. (2016). Parent Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) in screening: The Thai experience. Pediatrics International, 58(12), 1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.13055 3. De Moura, D. R., Costa, J. C., Santos, I. S., Barros, A. J. D., Matijasevich, A., Halpern, R., Dumith, S., Karam, S., & Barros, F. C. (2010). Risk factors for suspected developmental delay at age 2 years in a Brazilian birth cohort. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 24(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01115.x 4. Eratay, E., Bayoglu, B., & Anlar, B. (2015). Preschool developmental screening with Denver II test in semi-urban areas. J Pediatr Child Care, 1(2), 4. 5. Gil, J. D., Ewerling, F., Ferreira, L. Z., & Barros, A. J. (2020). Early childhood suspected developmental delay in 63 low- and middle-income countries: Large within- and between-country inequalities documented using national health surveys. Journal of Global Health, 10(1), 010427. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.10.010427
|
|