Capacity-Building for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences (PRO) Data Across Hospitals
-
Published:2023-06-22
Issue:9
Volume:27
Page:1460-1471
-
ISSN:1092-7875
-
Container-title:Maternal and Child Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Matern Child Health J
Author:
Saeb SamiaORCID, Korst Lisa M., Fridman Moshe, McCulloch Jeanette, Greene Naomi, Gregory Kimberly D.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Patient-reported outcomes and experiences (PRO) data are an integral component of health care quality measurement and PROs are now being collected by many healthcare systems. However, hospital organizational capacity-building for the collection and sharing of PROs is a complex process. We sought to identify the factors that facilitated capacity-building for PRO data collection in a nascent quality improvement learning collaborative of 16 hospitals that has the goal of improving the childbirth experience.
Description
We used standard qualitative case study methodologies based on a conceptual framework that hypothesizes that adequate organizational incentives and capacities allow successful achievement of project milestones in a collaborative setting. The 4 project milestones considered in this study were: (1) Agreements; (2) System Design; (3) System Development and Operations; and (4) Implementation. To evaluate the success of reaching each milestone, critical incidents were logged and tracked to determine the capacities and incentives needed to resolve them.
Assessment
The pace of the implementation of PRO data collection through the 4 milestones was uneven across hospitals and largely dependent on limited hospital capacities in the following 8 dimensions: (1) Incentives; (2) Leadership; (3) Policies; (4) Operating systems; (5) Information technology; (6) Legal aspects; (7) Cross-hospital collaboration; and (8) Patient engagement. From this case study, a trajectory for capacity-building in each dimension is discussed.
Conclusion
The implementation of PRO data collection in a quality improvement learning collaborative was dependent on multiple organizational capacities for the achievement of project milestones.
Funder
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health,Epidemiology
Reference38 articles.
1. Allen, C., Coleman, K., Mettert, K., Lewis, C., Westbrook, E., & Lozano, P. (2021). A roadmap to operationalize and evaluate impact in a learning health system. Learning health systems., 5(4), e10258. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10258 2. Auffenberg, G. B., Qi, J., Dunn, R. L., Linsell, S., Kim, T., Miller, D. C., Tosoian, J., Sarle, R., Johnston, W. K., 3rd., Kleer, E., Ghani, K. R., Montie, J., & Peabody, J. (2021). Evaluation of patient- and surgeon-specific variations in patient-reported urinary outcomes 3 months after radical prostatectomy from a statewide improvement collaborative. JAMA surgery, 156(3), e206359. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6359 3. Bingham, C. O., 3rd., Bartlett, S. J., Merkel, P. A., Mielenz, T. J., Pilkonis, P. A., Edmundson, L., Moore, E., & Sabharwal, R. K. (2016). Using patient-reported outcomes and PROMIS in research and clinical applications: experiences from the PCORI pilot projects. Quality of Life Research, 25(8), 2109–2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1246-1 4. Black, N., Burke, L., Forrest, C. B., Sieberer, U. H., Ahmed, S., Valderas, J. M., Bartlett, S. J., & Alonso, J. (2016). Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies. Quality of Life Research, 25(5), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1168-3 5. Breen, W., Choi, S., Hearld, K., O’Connor, S. J., Rafalski, E., & Borkowski, N. (2021). The association between an established Chief experience officer role and hospital patient experience scores. Patient Experience Journal, 8(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1508
|
|