Strengthening Recruitment and Retention: Mitigation Strategies in Two Longitudinal Studies of Pregnant Women in Pakistan
-
Published:2024-06-21
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1092-7875
-
Container-title:Maternal and Child Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Matern Child Health J
Author:
Yim Ilona S.ORCID, Ali Naureen Akber, Dosani Aliyah, Lalani Sharifa, Babar Neelofur, Nausheen Sidrah, Premji Shahirose Sadrudin,
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Global health researchers have a responsibility to conduct ethical research in a manner that is culturally respectful and safe. The purpose of this work is to describe our experiences with recruitment and retention in Pakistan, a low-middle-income country.
Description
We draw on two studies with a combined sample of 2161 low-risk pregnant women who participated in a pilot (n = 300) and a larger (n = 1861) prospective study of psychological distress and preterm birth at one of four centers (Garden, Hyderabad, Kharadar, Karimabad) of the Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.
Assessment
Challenges we encountered include economic hardship and access to healthcare; women’s position in the family; safety concerns and time commitment; misconceptions and mistrust in the research process; and concerns related to blood draws. To mitigate these challenges, we developed culturally acceptable study incentives, involved family members in the decision-making process about study participation, partnered with participants’ obstetrician-gynecologists, accommodated off site study visits, combined research visits with regular prenatal care visits, and modified research participation related to blood draws for some women.
Conclusion
Implementation of these mitigation strategies improved recruitment and retention success, and we are confident that the solutions presented will support future scientists in addressing sociocultural challenges while embarking on collaborative research projects in Pakistan and other low-middle-income countries.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Aga Khan University, University Research Council Multi-disciplinary Project Grant
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference15 articles.
1. Chansamouth, V., McGready, R., Chommanam, D., Homsombath, S., Mayxay, M., & Newton, P. N. (2017). Enrolling pregnant women in research: Ethical challenges encountered in Lao PDR (Laos). Reproductive Health, 14(Suppl 3), 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0428-9 2. Colom, M., & Rohloff, P. (2018). Cultural considerations for informed consent in paediatric research in low/middle-income countries: A scoping review. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 2(1), e000298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000298 3. Fisher, J., Cabral de Mello, M., Patel, V., Rahman, A., Tran, T., Holton, S., & Holmes, W. (2012). Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: A systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90(2), 139g–149g. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.11.091850 4. Frew, P. M., Saint-Victor, D. S., Isaacs, M. B., Kim, S., Swamy, G. K., Sheffield, J. S., Edwards, K. M., Villafana, T., Kamagate, O., & Ault, K. (2014). Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: An overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 59 Suppl 7(Suppl 7), S400–S407. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu726 5. Kadam, R. A. (2017). Informed consent process: A step further towards making it meaningful! Perspectives in Clinical Research, 8(3), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_147_16
|
|