The Impact of Culturally-Centered Care on Peripartum Experiences of Autonomy and Respect in Community Birth Centers: A Comparative Study

Author:

Almanza Jennifer I.ORCID,Karbeah J.’Mag,Tessier Katelyn M.,Neerland Carrie,Stoll Kathrin,Hardeman Rachel R.,Vedam Saraswathi

Abstract

Abstract Objective National studies report that birth center care is associated with reduced racial and ethnic disparities and reduced experiences of mistreatment. In the US, there are very few BIPOC-owned birth centers. This study examines the impact of culturally-centered care delivered at Roots, a Black-owned birth center, on the experience of client autonomy and respect. Methods To investigate if there was an association between experiences of autonomy and respect for Roots versus the national Giving Voice to Mothers (GVtM) participants, we applied Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for the overall sample and stratified by race. Results Among BIPOC clients in the national GVtM sample and the Roots sample, MADM and MORi scores were statistically higher for clients receiving culturally-centered care at Roots (MADM p < 0.001, MORi p = 0.011). No statistical significance was found in scores between BIPOC and white clients at Roots Birth Center, however there was a tighter range among BIPOC individuals receiving care at Roots showing less variance in their experience of care. Conclusions for Practice Our study confirms previous findings suggesting that giving birth at a community birth center is protective against experiences of discrimination when compared to care in the dominant, hospital-based system. Culturally-centered care might enhance the experience of perinatal care even further, by decreasing variance in BIPOC experience of autonomy and respect. Policies on maternal health care reimbursement should add focus on making community birth sustainable, especially for BIPOC provider-owners offering culturally-centered care.

Funder

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Interdisciplinary Research Leaders Program

National Institutes of Health

New Hampshire Charitable Foundation

Groundswell Fund

Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Minnesota Population Center

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health,Epidemiology

Reference32 articles.

1. Alliman, J., Stapleton, S., Write, J., Bauer, K., Slider, K., & Jolles, D. (2019). Strong start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns. Birth. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12433

2. Almanza, J., Karbeah, J., Kozhimannil, K., & Hardeman, R. (2019). The experience and motivations of midwives of color in Minnesota: Nothing for us without us. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 64, 598–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13021

3. Altman, M. R., Oseguera, T., McLemore, M. R., Kantrowitz-Gordon, I., Franck, L. S., & Lyndon, A. (2019). Information and power: Women of color’s experiences interacting with health care providers in pregnancy and birth. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112491

4. Attanasio, L. B., Hardeman, R. R., Kozhimannil, K. B., & Kjerulff, K. H. (2017). Prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery and actual delivery mode: Variation by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Birth, 44(4), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12305

5. Bohren, M. A., Mehrtash, H., Fawole, B., Maung, T. M., Balde, M. D., Maya, E., Thwin, S. S., Aderoba, A. K., Vogel, J. P., Irinyenikan, T. A., Adeyanju, A. O., Mon, N. O., Adu-Bonsaffoh, K., Landoulsi, S., Guure, C., Adanu, R., Diallo, B. A., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Soumah, A. M., … Tunçalp, Ö. (2019). How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: A cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. Lancet, 394(10210), 1750–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3