A Retrospective Cohort Study of Disparities in Urine Drug Testing During the Perinatal Period in an Urban, Academic Medical Center
-
Published:2024-06-07
Issue:8
Volume:28
Page:1395-1403
-
ISSN:1092-7875
-
Container-title:Maternal and Child Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Matern Child Health J
Author:
Ganetsky Valerie S.,Yates Brianna,Salzman Matthew,Heil Jessica,Jones Iris,Hunter Krystal,Perry Robin L.,Baston Kaitlan E.
Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate disparities in urine drug testing (UDT) during perinatal care at a single academic medical center. This retrospective cohort study included patients who had a live birth and received prenatal care at our institution between 10/1/2015 and 9/30/2020. The primary outcomes were maternal UDT during pregnancy (UDTPN) and UDT only at delivery (UDTDEL). Secondary outcomes included the number of UDTs (UDTNUM) and the association between a positive UDT test result and race/ethnicity. Mixed model logistic regression and negative binomial regression with clustering based on prenatal care locations were used to control for confounders. Of 6,240 live births, 2,265 (36.3%) and 167 (2.7%) received UDTPN and UDTDEL, respectively. Black (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.54–2.84) and individuals of Other races (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03–2.64) had greater odds of UDTPN compared to non-Hispanic White individuals. Black (beta = 1.12, p < 0.001) and Hispanic individuals (beta = 0.78, p < 0.001) also had a positive relationship with UDTNUM. Compared to individuals with non-Medicaid insurance, those insured by Medicaid had greater odds of UDTPN (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11–2.49) and had a positive relationship with UDTNUM (beta = 0.89, p < 0.001). No significant associations were found for UDTDEL and race/ethnicity. Despite receiving more UDT, Black individuals were not more likely to have a positive test result compared to non-Hispanic White individuals (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72–1.25). Our findings demonstrate persistent disparities in substance use testing during the perinatal period.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2017). Opioid use and opioiduse disorder in pregnancy. Committee Opinion 711. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 130(2), e81–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002235. 2. Chasnoff, I. J., Landress, H. J., & Barrett, M. E. (1990). The prevalence of illicit-drug or alcohol-use during pregnancy and discrepancies in mandatory reporting in Pinellas County, Florida. New England Journal of Medicine, 322(17), 1202–1206. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199004263221706. 3. Chin, J. M., Chen, E., Wright, T., Bravo, R. M., Nakashima, B. S., Kiyokawa, M., Karasaki, K., Estrada, P., Ghatnekar, R., Lee, M., & Bartholomew, M. L. (2022). Urine drug screening on labor and delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 4(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100733. 4. Ecker, J., Abuhamad, A., Hill, W., Bailit, J., Bateman, B. T., Berghella, V., Blake-Lamb, T., Guille, C., Landau, R., Minkoff, H., Prabhu, M., Rosenthal, E., Terplan, M., Wright, T. E., & Yonkers, K. A. (2019). Substance use disorders in pregnancy: Clinical, ethical, and research imperatives of the opioid epidemic: A report of a joint workshop of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and gynecologists, and American Society of Addiction Medicine. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 221(1), B5–B28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.022. 5. Hirai, A. H., Ko, J. Y., Owens, P. L., Stocks, C., & Patrick, S. W. (2021). Neonatal abstinencesyndrome and maternal opioid-related diagnoses in the US, 2010–2017. Journal of the American Medical Association, 325(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.24991.
|
|