Standardizing and Improving Primary Care-Based Electronic Developmental Screening for Young Children in Federally Qualified Health Center Clinics
-
Published:2024-08-12
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1092-7875
-
Container-title:Maternal and Child Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Matern Child Health J
Author:
Felix Gladys, Deavenport-Saman AlexisORCID, Stavros Sophia, Farboodi Niloofar, Arvizu Ramon Durazo, Garcia Joanna, Yin Larry, Gera Mona Patel
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Many barriers to implementation of developmental screening in primary care exist, especially for children from under-resourced communities. Developmental screening is vital to early detection of developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder, and early intervention (EI) referral. This study sought to examine whether implementation of a standardized clinical workflow using electronic screening tools improved both rates of developmental screening, and the number of children identified at risk for developmental delay, in a federally qualified health center (FQHC).
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted at an academic-affiliated FQHC. Electronic versions of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3 (ASQ-3) and Modified Checklist in Autism for Toddlers Revised (M-CHAT-R) were implemented at well-child visits. New clinical workflow training on developmental screening and EI referral was provided. Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact analyses were conducted.
Results
ASQ-3 screening rates increased from 62.7 to 73.6% pre- to post-intervention. Post-intervention, there was a significant decrease in paper screens (p < .001), and a significant increase in the percentage of children with ASQ-3 results in the below cutoff range from 14.7 to 18.2% (p < .002). M-CHAT-R screening rates increased from 56.4 to 59.4% pre- to post-intervention. Post-intervention, there was a significant increase in electronic screens (p < .001).
Conclusions for Practice
Implementation of electronic screening tools improved universal developmental screening in a FQHC. To decrease barriers in under-resourced communities, the use of electronic tools may decrease the rate of screening error seen with paper screening and have the potential to better identify children at risk for developmental delay.
Funder
University of Southern California
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Beacham, C., Reid, M., Bradshaw, J., Lambha, M., Evans, L., Gillespie, S., Klaiman, C., & Richardson, S. S. (2018). Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Profiles of children who are missed. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics: JDBP, 39(9), 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000607 2. Bellesheim, K. R., Kizzee, R. L., Curran, A., & Sohl, K. (2020). ECHO autism: Integrating maintenance of certification with extension for Community Healthcare outcomes improves Developmental Screening. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics: JDBP, 41(6), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000796 3. California Department of Health Care Services. Managed Care Quality and Monitoring Division California Department of Health Care Services (June 2022). https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Documents/MCQMD/2020-21-Preventive-Services-Report-0603.pdf. Accessed on: March 22, 2024. 4. Campbell, K., Carbone, P. S., Liu, D., & Stipelman, C. H. (2021). Improving autism screening and referrals with electronic support and evaluations in primary care. Pediatrics, 147(3), e20201609. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1609 5. Carroll, A. E., Bauer, N. S., Dugan, T. M., Anand, V., Saha, C., & Downs, S. M. (2014). Use of a computerized decision aid for developmental surveillance and screening: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA pediatrics, 168(9), 815–821. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics. 2014.464.
|
|